THE SNP MSP who quit the Scottish Government in a row over plans to reform the gender recognition process has been hailed as a “heroine” by JK Rowling.
The author, a vocal critic of the reforms whose views have been described as "cruel" and "inaccurate" by LGBT+ campaigners, praised Ash Regan, saying: “This is what a principled politician looks like.”
Her comments on Twitter came after Regan stood down as community safety minister in the Scottish Government.
On Tuesday, the SNP MSP said there should have been a free vote on the legislation last week.
READ MORE: We need to be bold in challenging the all-out assault on the trans community
She said then that her conscience would not allow her to vote for the Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Bill, quitting her ministerial post just hours before it faced its first vote at Holyrood.
Rowling, who has previously tweeted a picture of herself wearing a T-shirt calling Scotland’s First Minister a “destroyer of women’s rights” took to social media to praise Regan.
The Harry Potter author wrote: “This is what a principled politician looks like.
“@AshtenRegan will rightly be seen as a heroine when future generations of Scottish women look back at the profoundly misogynistic legislation currently being pushed through by the Sturgeon government.”
The legislation, which passed its first Holyrood vote by 88 to 33 last week, includes proposals that will remove the requirement for someone to obtain a medical diagnosis of gender dysphoria before they can seek a gender recognition certificate (GRC).
The proposals also set out to reduce the amount of time someone must live in their acquired gender from two years to three months, with an additional three-month reflection period – while the minimum age for obtaining a certificate will be cut from 18 to 16.
Regan tweeted her thanks to the “hundreds of constituents and others across Scotland” who had contacted her since she left the Government to support her stance.
She added: “This is an issue of a deep concern to many and I am touched that some have shared their experiences of trauma with me and their need for safe spaces.”
Giving a statement to journalists in the Scottish Parliament later, Regan said she had got into politics to improve the lives of women.
She said: “I deeply regret that I will not be able to continue in that work.
“My beliefs and my commitment to building a better Scotland for all of us, but especially for women and girls, is what drives me as a politician.
“It drives my politics, it drives me as a person as well.
“I think last week – for the SNP – the vote should have been a free vote.”
She said she had concerns around legal protections for women and her “conscience” would not allow her to vote for the Bill.
READ MORE: RECAP: Updates from Holyrood as GRA debate leads to minister's resignation
Regan added: “I want to be really clear on this point, I am not against reforms that make the lives of trans people better.
“But I want us to get into a place where we can respect everybody’s rights.”
She said First Minister Nicola Sturgeon was “well aware” of her concerns about the Bill, despite her letter saying Regan had not raised the issue with her.
Scottish Social Justice Secretary Shona Robison told Holyrood last week that the changes would make the process of obtaining a gender recognition certificate “simpler, more streamlined, and more respectful of the privacy and dignity of trans men and women”.
The bill is needed because “many trans people find the current system overly medicalised, complex, intrusive and invasive”, Robison said.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel