A SCOTTISH MP has spoken of his horror at how Britain is paying £1.8 million a year to fund policing institutions in Bahrain where prisoners are sentenced to death on the basis of confessions that have been beaten out of them.
Alistair Carmichael, LibDem spokesman on Home Affairs and Justice, was speaking at the launch of a new report which calls for a halt to payments by the Gulf Strategy Fund (GSF) to security forces in the Gulf state where 26 men are on death row.
Many were convicted solely on the basis of confessions extracted through torture methods including electric shocks, beatings, sexual assaults and hanging by the arms for days.
READ MORE: Peter Tatchell ‘arrested in Qatar while protesting against LGBT rights record’
“I think most British taxpayers will be absolutely horrified to learn about the use to which money which we pay to foreign governments is being put.”, Carmichael said.
“The fact that it’s going to a system which uses the death penalty in this way just takes that to another level.”
He was speaking at the Westminster launch of the report, called "The Court is Satisfied with the Confession": Bahrain Death Sentences Follow Torture, Sham Trials, compiled by Human Rights Watch (HRW) and the Bahrain Institute for Rights and Democracy (BIRD).
It examined six cases where prisoners have been sentenced to death solely on the basis of confessions that are claimed to have been extracted through beatings, sleep deprivation and use of electrical shocks to the chest and genitals.
Hotel bellboy Maher Abbas al-Khabbaz was arrested after a policeman was killed with a flare gun at pro-democracy demonstration. This was despite an alibi saying he was at work at the time with no other evidence against him.
He said: “Officers tied and hanged me using a metal bar between my legs. They then started beating me. They took off my shoes and socks and put them in my mouth. They started hitting me with a plastic club for long hours everywhere on my body. I remained in this state for a few days until blood stopped reaching my legs”.
The 27-year-old said he provided false information to “buy himself some time and stop the torture” but the abuse began again when it was discovered he’d been lying. His conviction was based on the confession of his brother, Fadhel, who was also tortured.
“We could hear each other’s screams when we were beaten.”, he said.
READ MORE: We're offering a year-long subscription – at the price you can afford
The family of Mohamed Ramadhan, 37, is campaigning for his release after the father-of-three was sentenced to death for the killing of a policeman hit by a flare during pro-democracy protests.
Campaigners say there is no evidence against the former security guard except for a confession of another man, Husain Moosa, extracted under torture.
According to a freedom of information request by BIRD the Bahrain Ministry of Interior, the Ministry of the Interior Ombudsman, and the Special Investigation Unit (SIU) in 2020-21 all received funding from the GSF, and all were implicated in the report.
Two oversight bodies – the ombudsman and SIU – were heavily criticised for not investigating claims of physical abuse that were often backed by medical evidence. One dismissed claims of torture simply because officers involved “denied committing abuses”.
Carmichael, a longtime campaigner against the death penalty across the world, said he was surprised how soft the UK was being on Bahrain over human rights abuses.
He said: “The thing that really concerns me about Bahrain – I’ve been involved in death penalty campaigning for the past 20 years – is that the conspiracy of silence is not just political. It runs through the whole of the official and diplomatic effort in Bahrain.
“I’ve visited America a few times, I’ve campaigned there for people on death row, and I’ve been to Japan and in all these places the UK diplomatic mission, the embassy and the consulates, were all incredibly supportive because they were part of a government effort that said: ‘We condemn the use of capital punishment wherever we find it’.
“But our interaction with diplomats from the UK mission in Bahrain, I have to say, has been one which looked more like advocacy for the Bahrain government in Britain rather than British standards in Bahrain. That is why this is particularly acute and anything that we can do to draw attention towards what’s going on will create in the United Kingdom that outrage that our money’s being used in this way.”
The Foreign Office said it funded projects in Bahrain to support the country’s reforms of its justice system.
A spokesman said: “All projects on justice and security issues with partners overseas are subject to rigorous risk assessments to meet our human rights’ expectations. While we recognise challenges remain, stepping back from supporting reforms would be counterproductive.”
How has Brexit affected your Scottish business?
Has Brexit had an impact on your Scottish business? Whether you work in hospitality, travel, or any other sector we would love to hear from you. We already know leaving the EU has meant empty shop shelves, delays in orders and price rises for Scots businesses. Now we want to hear from owners themselves to find out what Brexit has done to our firms.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel