THE Scottish Tories have reported a tweet to the Scottish Government’s top civil servant over claims it breaks the rules by promoting independence without evidence.
Craig Hoy, chair of the Scottish Conservatives, reported the tweet and said it made claims which were in breach of the rules surrounding government communications – which bar using official channels for “party political channels”.
What if Scotland had the powers to make its economy stronger?
— Scottish Government (@scotgov) October 18, 2022
The latest paper in the #ANewScotland series sets out how independence would mean full control over Scotland's:
🔵 Finances
🔵 Energy resources
🔵 Economic future
Find out more at https://t.co/GSg61IyPRY pic.twitter.com/zxPXCF5Ytf
In a letter to Scottish Government permanent secretary John-Paul Marks, the Tory MSP said the tweet presented claims about independence, including that the economy would grow faster if Scotland voted Yes, without evidence to back them up.
He said it was “completely unacceptable” and claimed government resources were being used to push “SNP propaganda”.
READ MORE: One of Liz Truss's most senior advisers 'suspended' amid ethics investigation
The Scottish Government’s rules bar civil servants from acting “in a way that is determined by party political considerations or [from using] official resources for party political purposes”.
The offending tweet, posted from the Scottish Government’s official Twitter account, cites evidence set out in in full in the Scottish Government’s independence papers and also links to the paper released on Monday which makes the economic case for independence and includes 300 footnotes of sources.
Hoy drew attention to the fact the two-minute video contains a segment contains a bar chart with a line appearing to show growth, with the caption: “What if Scotland had the powers to make its economy stronger?”
In his letter to Marks, he claimed this was intended to show Scotland’s “economy would grow faster with independence through the use of a bar graph with no axis”.
He added: “No statistical data is provided to support this graphic, which promotes what is clearly a political position, not an impartial statement of fact.”
In a statement, Hoy said: “There is a duty for civil servants to abide by the civil service code when it comes to political impartiality, but this post clearly did not do that.
READ MORE: Westminster blocking indyref2 as 'it's not in Scots' interests', says Pamela Nash
“It is another deeply worrying example of government resources being used to promote SNP propaganda and their relentless push for a divisive independence referendum next year.
“That is completely unacceptable and is why I have written to the permanent secretary to rule whether this tweet crossed a line regarding honesty and impartiality.
“The post was littered with misleading and partisan claims with a complete lack of facts to even attempt to back them up.
“Taxpayers will be seriously questioning the neutrality and reliability of these posts in future, given the Scottish Government were all too happy to peddle the SNP’s economic case for independence.
“The permanent secretary must intervene here and take action against a post which was a clear breach of the civil service code.”
A Scottish Government spokesperson said: “The letter has been received and we will respond in due course.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel