ALBA has called for a Scottish constitution convention to be set up following the Supreme Court’s ruling on a second independence referendum.
The pro-independence party, led by former first minister Alex Salmond, has appealed for the move as the court hears the case this week on whether Holyrood has the legal power to hold a vote without agreement from the Westminster government.
The matter was referred to the court by Scotland’s Lord Advocate after former prime minister Boris Johnson said he would not consent to transfer powers to Holyrood under a Section 30 order.
Alba depute leader Kenny MacAskill MP has called for a new constitutional convention, modelled on the one created in the late 1980s which preceded the re-establishment of the Scottish Parliament.
He said: “It has always been the case that it was for the Scottish Government to set out both the timetable and the means by which it would deliver a referendum by the end of 2023 with or without a Section 30 Order being granted.”
“However, the issue of Scotland’s right to choose will be put to the test this week. If, as widely expected, the Supreme Court rules that Scotland’s Parliament does not have the legal right to hold an independence referendum the futility of referring the matter to the Supreme Court in the first place will have been exposed for all to see.
“The key question then will be ‘who decides Scotland’s future?’ Is it the people of Scotland through their elected representatives or a Prime Minister and government at Westminster who our people have never elected?
“In the wake of the expected defeat in the Supreme Court we must take immediate and decisive action to shift the focus of the debate back to Scotland, where it belongs, rather than waiting for the next UK election, which could be as late as autumn 2024.
“That is why Alba is proposing a Scottish Constitutional Convention comprised of MSPs, MPs, council leaders, trade unions, civic Scotland and the wider community.
“Such a convention can play a vital role in asserting the democratic right of the people of Scotland to decide their own future.
“It would help secure a united political and civic independence movement, a prerequisite for success in any future referendum, and signal to Westminster and the internat- ional community that Scotland is on the march once again.
“No legal judgment from the Supreme Court or act of the Westminster Parliament can override the sovereign will of the Scottish people to determine our own constitutional future. This is the time for our government and our parliament to assert that sovereign will.
“The ruling of the Supreme Court will be a defining moment for Scottish Democracy. This Conservative government’s difficulties can yet become Scotland’s opportunity but only if we seize the initiative and stop handing the Tories a veto over our future.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel