SCOTLAND'S rail unions have called for a meeting with Nicola Sturgeon to discuss the future of the network, accusing the Scottish Government of a “lack of vision” for train services.
Aslef, Unite, the Rail, Maritime and Transport Workers Union (RMT) and the Transport Salaried Staffs’ Association (TSSA) have written to the First Minister a year on from the “A Vision for Scotland’s Railway” report where they outlined their hopes for the network such as removing peak fares, extending concessionary bus travel to the train network and modernising rolling stock.
Aslef’s Kevin Lindsay said it is time for the Scottish Government to “pick whose side they are on”.
He said of the First Minister: “We want to hear if she agrees with our vision of affordable fares, expanded services, accessible, well-staffed, and attractive stations, enhanced freight services, and the privateers driven out of our industry.
READ MORE: Dunfermline Town station to be renamed after King Charles visit
“Sadly, up until now, the Scottish Government has not shared our vision.”
It comes after a summer of bitter industrial disputes between rail unions, Network Rail and the UK Government which sparked strikes across the network, causing disruption for passengers.
Further strikes are planned for Wednesday and Saturday this week. Aslef drivers will walk out across several companies including Avanti West Coast and CrossCountry, and Network Rail staff who are members of the RMT will walk out on Saturday.
ScotRail staff are not directly impacted by strikes, but services on Saturday will be affected by industrial action.
In the letter signed by Lindsay, along with Michael Hogg from the RMT, Gary Kelly from the TSSA, and Pat McIlvogue from Unite, unions argue the disputes are being caused by “conflicting visions” for rail services in the country.
They stated: “On one hand there is our vision for public ownership across all parts of our rail services (including rolling stock companies and freight), investment and transformation to make our rail services world-class, and there is the Tory and privateer vision for managed decline – which includes attacking the wages, terms, and conditions of the greatest asset our railways have – its workforce.”
Union officials said there is “still no vision” for Scotland’s railways months after the Scottish government took them into public ownership and called for a meeting to discuss the future of rail services in Scotland.
The letter continued: “First Minister, we need to be honest with you: our vision for Scotland’s Railways emerged in the absence of any vision coming from your government.
“A few months after ScotRail going back into public ownership, we are afraid say that there is still no vision for Scotland’s Railways being presented by the Scottish Government.”
READ MORE: John Swinney says he can't promise to insulate Scotland from UK's 'fiscal recklessness'
The letter went on to say: “It is now time to decide whose side you’re on. Do you share our vision for affordable, accessible, attractive, world-class rail services that help Scotland meet its climate targets, deliver social policies, and grow our economy? Or, do you share the Tory vision for managed decline of rail services?
“One year on from the publication of our Vision for Scotland’s Railways and set against the context of continuing industrial disputes across UK rail services, we believe that it is an opportune time for us to now meet and discuss the future of Scotland’s rail services with you.
“We would therefore respectfully like to request a meeting with you as soon as possible. In so doing we hope that we can agree on a common purpose that rejects the vision for decline, and which instead sees us work together towards the building of world class rail services in Scotland.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here