PRIME Minister Liz Truss has refused to rule out real-terms benefit cuts in order to help pay for her government’s tax-cutting growth plan.
Critics who forced a U-turn over the plan to abolish the 45p tax rate for top earners are now stepping up the pressure on the Government to confirm benefits will be raised.
Commons leader Penny Mordaunt has publicly backed increasing them in line with inflation so that people can pay their bills amid the cost-of-living crisis.
Downing Street has not denied suggestions that Truss could resist rebels’ pressure to increase benefits in line with earnings, which are expected to be much lower than inflation.
READ MORE: Scottish Greens say Chancellor 'has to go' after reversing 45p tax rate plans
Chancellor Kwasi Kwarteng has already made a second change of course to reassure markets and Tory rebels by bringing forward his medium-term fiscal plan along with independent forecasts.
Truss has committed to increase pensions in line with prices but on benefits she said “we have to be fiscally responsible”.
In an interview pre-recorded on Monday, Truss told Tuesday’s BBC Radio 4’s Today programme: “We are going to have to make decisions about how we bring down debt as a proportion of GDP in the medium term.
“I am very committed to supporting the most vulnerable; in fact, in addition to the energy price guarantee we’re also providing an extra £1200 to the poorest households.
“So we have to look at these issues in the round, we have to be fiscally responsible.”
Benefits are usually uprated in line with the consumer price index (CPI) rate of inflation from September, with the rise coming into effect the following April.
The Institute for Fiscal Studies estimates that each percentage point rise in CPI adds £1.6 billion to welfare spending.
READ MORE: Chancellor Kwasi Kwarteng announces plans to abandon abolishing 45p tax rate
Truss told LBC radio that “no decision has been made yet on benefit uprating”, adding that it “will be taken in due course”.
She was then pressed on why she committed to increasing pensions but not benefits. Truss added: “What I mean is when people are on a fixed income, when they are pensioners, it is quite hard to adjust.
“I think it’s a different situation for people who are in the position of being able to work.”
Mordaunt, who ran against Truss in the Tory leadership contest, said it “makes sense” to increase benefits in line with inflation.
She told Times Radio: “I’ve always supported, whether it’s pensions, whether it’s our welfare system, keeping pace with inflation. It makes sense to do so. That’s what I voted for before and so have a lot of my colleagues.
“We want to make sure that people are looked after and that people can pay their bills. We are not trying to help people with one hand and take away with another.”
Tory chairman of the Treasury Select Committee Mel Stride said he would need to “think long and hard” if asked to vote to increase benefits in line with earnings rather than inflation.
He told Today: “The last time the benefits were uprated, because of the way the mechanism works they’re uprated in April but they’re pegged against the previous September’s inflation, and the way it worked last time was the uprating was just 3.1% because inflation was low the previous September, but of course inflation was much higher than that (in April).
“So we’re coming off the back actually of a kind of quite a strong real-terms squeeze on those benefits already so I think that will be a really tough call to make.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel