AN economic justice campaigner has said Scotland must have a clearer and more effective tax system than the UK does if it is to adopt its own currency post-independence.
On the latest IndyLive podcast, Professor Richard Murphy, who campaigns on tax avoidance and evasion, said while he is in “no question” an independent Scotland would need to have its own currency, it must adopt a different political approach to tax than the current “light touch” of the UK Government.
He insisted having a strong tax system would ensure the country could deliver real social justice and reduce inequality.
“While there is no question in my mind that an independent Scotland has to have its own currency, and has to have that as quickly as possible after independence, we also have to address in that critical period between announcing independence and getting to independence day how the Scottish tax system will work,” said Murphy.
“We can use tax for the social advantage of a country that really wants to deliver social justice.
“I genuinely believe that is one of the major reasons the people Scotland want to be independent is to get rid of the ghastly neo-liberal mess they have had to live under for so long and if that’s the case then my argument is we need a strong, effective tax system in an independent Scotland, not just to support the value of the currency - because it will do that - but also to deliver those social and economic policies that will build the foundations for genuine prosperity across Scotland in the future.”
READ MORE: FACT CHECK: Independent Scotland is destined for a currency 'fiasco'
Murphy – who has been a major critic of the Government Expenditure and Revenue Scotland (GERS) figures over the years – claimed Westminster has underfunded HM Revenue and Customs since it came into existence from a merger between Inland Revenue and HM Customs and Excise in 2005.
The department now has just over 60,000 staff compared to 100,000 17 years ago when it was formed, he said.
He highlighted how he last month received a reply to a letter he sent to HMRC more than three years ago, citing it as a sign of “just how bad the service is”.
Murphy insisted an independent Scotland must have a functioning tax authority to make sure people pay their way, know where they stand and ensure social and economic policies designed to level up society can be delivered.
He added: “In the UK, we have lived for a long time with governments who have been willing to stand back, have a light touch on regulation and underfund HM Revenue and Customs.
“I was around in 2005/06 when it was formed as a result of the merger between Inland Revenue and HM Customs and Excise, and there was one reason for the creation of that and it was to cut costs. There was 100,000 staff in 2006 is it’s now about 60,000.
“I got a reply to a letter the other day, it took three and a half years. That’s how bad the service now is.
READ MORE: SNP must drop disastrous policy on currency after Scottish independence
“We need a functioning tax authority in Scotland to give people certainty about where they stand, to make sure everyone pays the right amount of tax and to ensure that therefore the social and economic policies which the tax system of a country is critically able to deliver. It has to function well to do that.”
Murphy – who spoke at the Scottish Sovereignty Research Group conference in Dunfermline last month - also offered an explanation as to how an effective tax system would ensure the Scottish pound had value.
He added: “One of the biggest questions I’m asked is simply how do we make sure that the Scottish currency is used? Why will people use it?
“People will have to use the Scottish currency – if the Scottish Government decides to have its own currency - for one straightforward reason and that is that the Scottish Government will say you must pay your tax using the Scottish pound, and because you have to pay your tax bill in Scottish pounds, two things follow.
READ MORE: The question of an independent Scotland's currency answered in 40 seconds
“First of all, no business will take the risk of trading in another currency because the risk of trading in one currency and owing the tax bill in another will be too big, and the same thing is true with regard to people.
“So the reality is the biggest reason why we need a functioning Scottish tax system is to force the use of the Scottish currency into everyday operation and at the same time that tax system has to be very clear and effective, much more so I would suggest than the UK system is now which only collects about 90p in the pound of everything that is owing.”
“What we need in an independent Scotland is strong, macroeconomic control of the economy of Scotland because if it [the Government] was to actually say we want to ensure everybody pays their fair rate of tax because we want a positive redistributive tax system that reduces inequality, then it must make sure that everyone pays and that requires Scotland to have a very different political and economic approach to tax.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel