THE grandson of Winston Churchill, Rupert Soames, is to step down from his role leading Serco, a company that holds millions of pounds worth of contracts with the Government.
The chief executive said “it is now time to outsource myself” after nearly a decade at the business.
The outsourcer will instead be led by Mark Irwin, a private equity veteran who has been at Serco since 2013.
Soames took the reins at a troubled Serco in 2014. The news of his appointment sent shares up by 10% at the time.
READ MORE: 'Major victory' as hundreds of jobs to be transferred to Scotland's NHS
It followed four months without a permanent chief executive in place at the company after Christopher Hyman left in the wake of a Government contract scandal.
The business agreed to repay more than £68 million for overcharging on a contract to provide electronic tagging of offenders. The company had been charging to tag prisoners who were later found to be dead, in prison or overseas.
A subsidiary later took responsibility for three counts of fraud and two of false accounting after an investigation by the Serious Fraud Office.
This is what Soames had to deal with when he arrived at the company nine years ago.
“Serco is unrecognisable from the business that he joined in 2014,” said chair John Rishton.
READ MORE: Covid contracts help deliver bumper profits and revenues for Serco
“Under his leadership, the business was stabilised, a clear strategy developed and executed, which has resulted in the strong and successful business it is today.
“Rupert should be really proud of what he has achieved.”
Soames said: “It has been the privilege of my working life to lead Serco for the last eight years, but it is now time for me to outsource myself.
“My respect and admiration for the wonderful team of people at Serco, who work so hard to deliver superb public services and value for money for taxpayers, is unbounded, as it is for Serco’s customers, who are dedicated public servants facing the immense challenges of delivering high-quality public services in difficult times.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel