TOP human rights lawyers have been hired by an SNP MP as he continues his legal battle with the UK Government over secret polling on the union.
The data under dispute relates to tax-payer funded polling on attitudes towards the union and Scottish independence taken in 2018.
The MP for Edinburgh East, Tommy Sheppard, previously won an Information Commissioner ruling to have the documents made public.
However, after the Cabinet Office refused to release them, Sheppard was forced to take the government to court.
The MP’s legal team have now sent their written submission to the court where a judgment could be decided without an oral hearing.
Speaking to The Herald, Sheppard said that he was only able to hire the prestigious Bindmans firm after a crowdfunding campaign raised nearly £10,000.
He said: "This is now not so much about polling and independence, but about the right to know.
READ MORE: Downing Street commissioned £130,000 legal advice for PM
“It should ring alarms bells with anyone concerned about what the government is doing," he said.
"I hope the judge will find in our favour, the Cabinet Office abide by that and that will be the end of the matter as it's been going on for far too long. But I am dealing here with a very belligerent and intransigent Cabinet Office."
Sheppard originally requested the data be made public through a Freedom of Information request in 2019, which was rejected by Whitehall.
Since then, the Cabinet Office has appealed the ruling to hand over the information twice.
The legal firm Sheppard has hired have represented a host of high-profile clients.
They include the families of those affected by the Grenfell fire and Hillsborough football disaster.
Bindmans lawyers also represented former Ministry of Defence official Clive Ponting after leaked documents relating to the sinking of the Argentinian ship the General Belgrano during the Falklands War resulted in him being arrested and charged with breaching the Official Secrets Act.
A judge directed the jury to convict Ponting but he was acquitted of the crimes.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel