THOUSANDS of people have signed a petition in protest of water being transferred from Wales to drought-hit areas of England.
John Armitt, chair of the National Infrastructure Commission, told BBC Radio Four earlier this week that water companies in England did not want to reinvest in reservoirs and that they were unpopular with communities that did not want to see their land flooded.
He then went on to say Severn Trent and Thames Water were in talks to move water from Wales to the south of England – where drought was declared earlier this month in areas such as Devon, Cornwall, Kent and London.
Plans suggest water would be taken from United Utilities at Lake Vyrnwy in Powys and passed through pipes or a canal to the Thames basin.
READ MORE: Tories rage as Nicola Sturgeon heads to Copenhagen to open Nordic Office
GMB London – a water workers’ union - has said the plan could help deal with periodic droughts in and around the UK’s capital and is “financially viable”.
But more than 3500 people in Wales have now signed a petition against the move, saying it is another example of “London syphoning away our most valuable resource without any consultation or benefit to communities”.
The petition, launched by Welsh independence supporter Nerys Jenkins on change.org, argues the Welsh Senedd should have full control of natural resources in the country.
It states: “Work has already begun to transfer water from Wales to drought-hit areas of England, according to the Chair of the National Infrastructure Commission.
For everyone in #Wales getting exercised about the Vyrnwy-Thames water transfer scheme floated the other day, “work has already begun” because it’s easier than persuading a few in SE to flood some fields.
— Richard Martin (@mimosacymru) August 19, 2022
Pretty bitter pill for the lost communities of Wales. pic.twitter.com/YYy9lQQSAD
“Water is a valuable commodity and this is another example of London syphoning away our most valuable resource without any consultation or benefit to our communities.
“Wales is rich in natural resources and we cannot continue to allow our future and our wealth to be taken from us. All natural resources must benefit us the people who live in Wales.”
The petition goes on to suggest by one calculation Wales’ present export of water to England - from the Elan Valley to Birmingham and from Lake Vyrnwy and Tryweryn to Liverpool - could be worth as much as £4.5 billion a year.
Take a few seconds out to sign our petition- a few clicks can make a world of difference.
— YesCymru 🏴 (@YesCymru) August 25, 2022
Cymerwch eiliad i lofnodi ein deiseb - gall clic neu ddau wneud byd o wahaniaeth.#Annibyniaeth #Indywaleshttps://t.co/tkmsrGULrP
GMB Wales is also against the plan arguing discussions need “far more detail”.
Tom Hoyles, GMB political officer for Wales, said: "Any proposals are currently at an exploratory phase and are not official union policy.
“GMB Wales believes discussions on this matter need far more detail as to how the infrastructure would be developed, how it would affect our workers on the ground and how the water would be paid for.”
READ MORE: Joanna Cherry: Scotland should act NOW in light of Tavistock clinic findings
The National Infrastructure Commission carries out in-depth studies into the UK’s major infrastructure needs and makes recommendations to the UK Government.
Armitt said water companies were looking at having “more water in the supply side by building more reservoir capacity, or in addition, providing a water transfer scheme so you transport water from where you’ve got a surplus in the country to the areas where you are likely to have a shortage”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel