DEPUTY First Minister John Swinney has criticised Labour and Tory Cosla members for “not grasping the seriousness of the situation” over the ongoing bin strikes.
The local authority body, which is chaired by council leaders from Scotland’s 32 local authorities, last week voted to put a 3.5% pay offer on the table for cleansing workers.
Unions swiftly rejected the offer, which has led to industrial action across the country, kicking off in Edinburgh where photographs of rubbish-filled streets and overflowing bins shocked the country during the busy festival season.
READ MORE: Scotland’s economy loses billions after slow UK recovery, report says
And, as further industrial action kicks off in other councils across Scotland, including Glasgow, Aberdeen and Dundee, the Deputy FM has said the current situation is a matter of “serious concern”, but added he wants to see it resolved.
Probed on the Scottish Government’s role in the negotiations, Swinney said that he was “frustrated” by Labour and Tory council leaders voting through the 3.5% offer in the first place, when the Scottish Government had already fronted up the cash to allow them to go to 5%.
Swinney added that despite handing over £140 million to local government, it would not be a “pain-free exercise” and warned cuts would have to come from elsewhere, as the Scottish Government operates with a fixed budget.
Speaking in Edinburgh, Swinney said: “One thing that is frustrating is the fact that Cosla did not immediately engage in discussions with trade unions about a 5% offer when I put the money on the table to enable that to happen.
“That happened because a majority of Cosla leaders voted against an SNP proposal to offer 5%.
“That would have given another week for dialogue taking place, a critical week in advance of the Edinburgh cleansing dispute.
“So the point of legitimate criticism of local government, in my view, is the Cosla leaders response to what they asked for. They got £140 million.
“Because of the votes of non-SNP leaders in Cosla, putting off that offer to employees was delayed by a week.
READ MORE: What is GERS and why is it so important?
“I think that was a critical week in timing, and I'm not at all surprised that unions are annoyed and frustrated by it.
“I think if non-SNP local government leaders had grasped the seriousness of the situation and the urgency and the response to it financially, maybe we'd be in a better place.”
Unions, which are demanding urgent talks with Swinney, want the Scottish Government to step in and find more cash to resolve the pay dispute.
Wendy Dunsmore, of Unite, said Scottish ministers needed to match the £1925 pay rise being given to local government workers in the rest of the UK.
Dunsmore told BBC Radio Scotland: “Our first wave was in Edinburgh, the second wave is waste across Scotland, our third wave is going to be schools.
“And it may not stop at schools, we’re in here for the long haul.”
She added: “Our members are demanding a better pay rise, and who knows where we are going to go next?
“We’re looking for a winter of discontent, even though we’re just approaching autumn.”
First Minister Nicola Sturgeon has already made clear the Scottish Government does not have a “bottomless pit of money” to resolve the dispute.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel