LIZ Truss “hates” her own policy promising a ban on LGBT+ conversion therapy, a key ally has suggested.
Iain Duncan Smith, the former Tory leader who is working as the director of Truss’s leadership campaign, suggested she was likely to U-turn on the pledge to ban conversion therapy, according to reports in OpenDemocracy.
In October 2021, the Foreign Secretary boasted of the UK being “a global leader on LGBT+ rights [that] is committed to banning the coercive and abhorrent practice of conversion therapy”.
However, standing in for Truss at an event hosted by the Conservative Christian Fellowship (CCF) on Tuesday, Duncan Smith suggested both he and Truss actually “hated” the idea of banning it.
OpenDemocracy quoted the Tory MP as saying of a conversion therapy ban: “I hate it. Can I be clear about that? I think when you start banning things like this you enter a maze of problems. And I absolutely believe that Liz is very much there.
“People are allowed their beliefs. You may not agree with them all the time. But the idea you ban them from this is this kind of ghastly woke culture ...
"I think this is a trap for politicians to head down and it will just make life worse. So Liz is strong on all this woke stuff. And I think she will certainly take the same view as I and many others do.”
READ MORE: 'His Section 28 moment': Johnson slated for trans conversion therapy ban U-turn
Earlier this year, Boris Johnson performed two U-turns in the space of a single day on his policy on conversion therapy.
He first planned to drop a ban on the practice altogether – going back on previous Tory policy.
However, Johnson soon U-turned and backed a ban on conversion therapy for LGB people – excluding trans people – after a backlash from MPs and ministers.
The flip-flopping led Iain Anderson, the Tories’ LGBT business champion, to quit. He said his role was “not LGB or T, and that’s why I’m walking away”.
In April, the British Medical Association said conversion therapy was “unethical and damaging” and should be banned in all its forms including for trans people.
Liz Truss’s campaign was approached for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel