RISHI Sunak’s bid to outlaw university degrees that don’t increase students' earning potential is a cynical ploy to “play to the Tory grassroots gallery”, the Scottish education secretary has said.
The Tory leadership contender vowed to reform post-16 education as part of his bid to win votes to become the next prime minister and pledged to introduce a British Baccalaureate, in England, to stop 16-year-old pupils from dropping maths and English.
Shirley-Anne Somerville said that the plans show the Tories are “not looking at education seriously” and that some degrees are more valuable than earning potential alone.
READ MORE: Boris Johnson told to recall Commons to tackle the spiralling cost-of-living crisis
It comes as Scottish secondary students are set to receive their results for the first in-person exams on Tuesday since the pandemic began.
The former chancellor said he would assess university degrees through their drop-out rates, numbers of graduate jobs and salary thresholds, with exceptions put in place for nursing and other courses with high social value.
Sunak’s campaign also said he would expedite the Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Bill, which is currently in the House of Lords, in a bid to appeal to the right of the Tory membership.
The UK Government has argued the Bill is needed to tackle growing intolerance in universities, but opponents have said it aims to address a problem that does not exist and could protect hate speech.
Launching the policy, Sunak said: “These proposals represent a significant stride towards parity of esteem between vocational and academic education. And they will take a tougher approach to university degrees that saddle students with debt, without improving their earning potential.”
Higher education is devolved in Scotland, and university tuition fees are free, unlike in England where students have to pay £9250 for each year of their degree.
On Sunak’s plans to outlaw degrees which don’t increase students' future earnings, the specifics of which have not yet been revealed, Somerville said she did not agree with his assessment.
She told The National: “I think both the Conservative leadership contenders are playing to the Tory grassroots gallery and what they're actually not looking at is education seriously.
READ MORE: Boris Johnson refuses to summon emergency Cobra meeting after return from holiday
“We have young people going through colleges and universities through a myriad of different courses that will set them up on different paths for life and, and we need to look at what's right for the economy, what's right for society, and what education is for.
“I think to be fair, I think he's just playing to his own gallery in an attempt to see what he can do to cling on to a chance of winning.”
Asked if she agrees that the main focus of degrees should be earning potential, Somerville said: “Young people will look at that as they choose a university degree that's one of the things, of course, people can bear in mind, but there's a lot more to education than that.
“It's about helping society. It's about what education is all about, and I think we should trust our young people, trust our universities and colleges to be able to deliver what's the right opportunities for our children and young people.”
Both Sunak and his opponent Liz Truss have made several policy announcements relating to education in recent days.
Truss has suggested changing the academic calendar to allow university terms to start in January instead of August, and proposed that all students with three A* at A-level should automatically be given an interview with Oxford or Cambridge as a way of improving access.
The Foreign Secretary’s campaign team also said she would reform admissions to allow students to apply for university places after they receive their exam results.
Sunak’s campaign team have been contacted for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel