TECHNOLOGY company Dyson has been fined more than a million pounds after one of its employees was injured when a giant milling machine fell on top of him.
The business was ordered to pay £1.2 million at Swindon Magistrates’ Court after pleading guilty to breaching health and safety laws.
A man at the company’s factory in Wiltshire was injured when the 1.5 tonne piece of equipment fell on top of him while he was at work in August 2019.
Along with a colleague, he was moving a computer-assisted milling machine at the Tetbury Hill, Malmesbury, site.
They lifted it up with a five-tonne jack, and were replacing some wheels with wooden blocks when it fell.
It struck the man and his head and chest were injured, the Health and Safety Executive said.
Its investigators found that Dyson had not provided “suitable and sufficient information, instruction and training” to its staff.
It had also not put systems in place to ensure that the machine was moved safely.
In the end the man escaped being crushed only because the machine landed on two toolboxes and the handle of another machine.
“This incident could have been fatal,” said Health and Safety Executive (HSE) inspector James Hole. “Those in control of work have a duty to assess the risks, devise safe methods of working and to provide the necessary information, instruction and training to their workforce.
“Had a suitable safe system of work been in place this incident and the related injuries could have been prevented.”
Dyson said: “The health, safety and well-being of Dyson’s people is our number one priority. Prior to this case, Dyson has had no convictions, or enforcement history related to health and safety at work.
“We are thankful that the employee was not more seriously hurt and has been able to return to work at Dyson.
“As an engineering company, we use complex and often heavy equipment and take care to do so safely. We deeply regret that this happened and we accept the court’s decision today.
“We were pleased that in its judgement the court noted our ‘excellent safety record’, our ‘prompt response to this incident and full cooperation at the highest level within the company’ and said that Dyson is an ‘exemplary corporate citizen’.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel