A FORMER UK health secretary said it would be a “grave mistake” to introduce compensation payments for infected blood victims in Scotland, according to documents shown at the inquiry into the matter.
Alan Milburn, who served in Tony Blair's Cabinet, told his Scottish counterpart that providing cash would be a "slippery slope" that ends up costing millions.
On Thursday, the Infected Blood Inquiry heard from Malcolm Chisholm, who was a health minister in what was then the Scottish Executive.
He told the inquiry that during his time in the role - from 2001 to 2004 - he had been involved in discussions with the Scottish health and community care committee, as well as UK Government counterparts, regarding a financial compensation scheme for people who had been infected with hepatitis C after receiving blood products.
READ MORE: Infected blood victims had ‘incredibly bad luck’, Sir John Major tells inquiry
In 2000, Chisholm said he did not initially believe payments should be made to a wider group of people where “no fault was involved”.
However, after receiving two petitions from the public on the issue, the health and community care committee recommended a year later that those who had been infected with the hepatitis C virus during NHS treatment should be compensated.
Following this, Chisholm said he did “not want to reject findings” outright and set up an “expert group” to examine the committee’s findings.
The expert group reiterated the committee’s findings, which Chisholm then communicated to his UK counterpart Milburn.
“I indicated to him in general terms I was going to offer some kind of payment to, at least, some of the people affected," Chisholm told Katie Scott, junior counsel to the inquiry on Thursday.
Chisholm was asked if Milburn had put pressure on him to reconsider plans.
He replied: “Well, I mean, he certainly wasn’t happy and I’ve already mentioned that whatever we proposed was going to have a knock-on effect on other administrations, so no, obviously he wasn’t particularly happy about what we were proposing.”
Scott asked: “Did he try to change your mind?”
Chisholm answered: “I wouldn’t say he was too heavy, he knew I took a different view to him on several matters so perhaps he just thought, here’s another one.
“He did try to persuade me but he didn’t become acrimonious.
The inquiry then presented Chisholm with an email from Milburn’s private secretary which was a record of the telephone conversation the two ministers had held.
It revealed Milburn told Chisholm that bringing in compassionate payments of £10,000 initially, when people became infected with the virus, and a further £40,000 when the virus became chronic, would be a “grave mistake”.
The email goes on to say: “Once the principle we had established had been breached, then we were scuppered and on a slippery slope to payments running into the millions across the UK.”
Milburn, who served as secretary of state between 1999 and 2003, then said Malcolm Chisholm will have to “tough it out”.
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon addresses Scotland's 'unacceptable' drugs deaths crisis
He instructed civil servants to “find some way of showing that the Scots don’t have the devolved power to go it alone” on the issue.
Chisholm confirmed it was an accurate report of the exchange and said there were two other issues complicating the matter.
“If this was not a devolved matter, it would be difficult, if not impossible, to make any of these payments,” he said.
He also wrote to the Department for Work and Pensions to ensure payments would not be clawed back through benefits payments.
Chisholm added: “Even people who thought, ‘why are you even talking to the UK Government?’ would have to acknowledge that none of this could be implemented unless we resolved the devolved power issues and the social security issue.”
The former health minister was also constrained by the department’s budget. The expert group recommended costs of about £89 million, which Chisholm said would have been “very difficult to find”.
The inquiry is examining how thousands of patients in the UK were infected with HIV and hepatitis C through contaminated blood products in the 1970s and 1980s.
About 2400 people died in what has been labelled the worst treatment disaster in the history of the NHS.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel