BORIS Johnson has claimed his meeting with ex-KGB officer Alexander Lebedev after the Salisbury poisoning scandal was not pre-arranged and did not involve discussions about Government business.
The Prime Minister said officials were aware in advance he was attending an event at the house of the Russian oligarch’s son, Evgeny Lebedev, in Italy.
But Johnson, who was then foreign secretary, added it would “not have been normal practice” for civil servants or security staff to have accompanied him to a “private, social occasion”.
READ MORE: Eurovision: Glasgow and Aberdeen bid to host contest in 2023
He also noted he took no ministerial papers with him, adding: “As far as I am aware, no Government business was discussed.”
His remarks came in a letter to the Commons Liaison Committee in which he expanded upon his previous admission that he met Alexander Lebedev without officials present in 2018.
Johnson has been under mounting pressure to explain the nature of the meeting, which happened straight after a Nato summit on how to respond to the Kremlin, and whether it was properly disclosed.
The scrutiny also comes amid an investigation by the Commons Intelligence and Security Committee over the appointment to the House of Lords of Evgeny Lebedev, the owner of the London Evening Standard and a shareholder in The Independent.
The appointment has been shrouded in controversy after The Sunday Times alleged security services withdrew an assessment that the peerage posed a national security risk after the Prime Minister intervened.
Johnson said: “In April 2018, I attended a social event at the house of Evgeny Lebedev in Italy.
“In the interests of transparency, I declared the overnight stay in the ministerial returns which can be found on gov.uk.
“At this social event, I also met Evgeny Lebedev’s father.
“This was not a formal meeting, nor something that was pre-arranged.
“Officials were aware in advance that I was attending the social event.
“Contrary to some reports, my visit was in line with established security protocols under successive foreign secretaries.
READ MORE: Keir Starmer asks Gordon Brown to help 'distinctly British' Labour economy plans
“It would not have been normal practice for civil servants or security staff to have accompanied me to such a private, social occasion.
“I did not take ministerial papers with me.
“If a minister meets an external organisation or individual and finds themselves discussing official business without an official present, for example at a social occasion, any significant content should be passed back to the department after the event.
“That was not necessary in this case.
“As far as I am aware, no Government business was discussed.
“At the time, the Lebedevs’ company owned the Evening Standard and the Independent, and the London Live television company.
“Its ownership of and participation in British newspaper publishing was not disputed.”
Johnson used the rest of his written reply to defend his response to the Salisbury poisonings and to highlight actions taken against Russia.
He added “historic returns” up to 2016 from Labour about their meetings with senior media executives showed “considerable engagement by the shadow cabinet with Evgeny Lebedev and attendance at his social events”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel