THE two remaining candidates to be the next prime minister have been branded “hypocrites” by Nicola Sturgeon over past comments on referendums.
Rishi Sunak and Liz Truss secured their place in the final vote by Tory members this week, kicking off more than a month of intense campaigning before the result is announced on September 5 and the new prime minister enters Number 10.
The First Minister said neither candidate would receive the backing of the Scottish people, reiterating her claims that there is a “deep democratic deficit” in the UK.
The National revealed in 2017, Sunak said it would be “hard” to block a second vote on Scottish independence - but that it should be pushed until after Brexit.
He told the Daily Express at the time: “It seems hard to block a [second] referendum but we should push the timing until after Brexit so the choice is clearer for people.
“A good deal will strengthen the case for the Union.”
The National also unearthed a clip of Truss, speaking at the 1994 Liberal Democrat party conference – when she was a member of the party – showing her support for votes “on major constitutional issues”.
Yet both candidates have since expressed their opposition to another vote on Scottish independence.
READ MORE: Scottish Tories 'resentful' about Truss vs Sunak leadership fight
Sunak told the Spectator podcast this week that another referendum is “not the priority” for people in Scotland.
When asked if she would agree to a request for indyref2 under any circumstances, Truss said this week: “No.
“The last referendum in 2014 was described as a once-in-a-generation referendum, we’re now in 2022 – that is not a generation ago.”
The First Minister said it shows Sunak and Truss are “hypocrites”.
She said: “There’s been comments in the media from both of them in previous years in the last few days.
“Liz Truss talking about the importance of referenda in settling constitutional issues, Rishi Sunak a few years ago saying that there should be a referendum after Brexit – well we are after Brexit.
“They’re hypocrites – changing their position just to suit their narrow, party-political, democracy-denying agendas.
“It’s not about the interests of Scotland, it’s about their own interests.”
Recognising that a Section 30 order – which would devolve the required powers to Holyrood for a referendum to be held – is unlikely to be granted by any occupant of Number 10, the First Minister asked Scotland’s top legal officer to refer a prospective referendum Bill to the UK Supreme Court.
The court has been asked to decide if the Scottish Parliament has the powers to legislate for a referendum, with arguments from both sides due on October 11 and 12.
Sturgeon said: “I hope the outcome of the Supreme Court case will be that the Scottish Parliament can legislate for an advisory referendum to give people the opportunity to have their say on independence.”
READ MORE: 'This is so awkward': Liz Truss grilled by kids on Peterborough campaign visit
She went on to describe both the Foreign Secretary and the former chancellor as “dismal choices” for prime minister.
“Scotland wouldn’t vote for either of them, even if it got the chance, which it’s not getting,” she said.
“Whether it’s Rishi Sunak or Liz Truss, it’s going to be another Tory prime minister governing Scotland that Scotland hasn’t voted for and wouldn’t vote for.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel