FACTIONS within the Labour party treated antisemitism as a “weapon”, a long-awaited report into a leaked dossier has found.
The report makes difficult reading for all sides of the Labour Party, describing a “toxic” atmosphere fuelled by factionalism.
Martin Forde QC, a barrister and former independent adviser to the Windrush compensation scheme, was chosen by Labour’s ruling National Executive Committee (NEC) to chair an inquiry into the “circumstances, contents and release” of the “internal” antisemitism dossier in 2020.
The leaked 860-page document found “no evidence” of antisemitism being handled differently from other complaints and blamed “factional opposition” towards former leader Jeremy Corbyn for hampering efforts to tackle the issue.
READ MORE: 'Shameless' Labour MSP defies party over proposed ban on MSPs standing for Westminster
Corbyn allies used the dossier to say elements of the party undermined his leadership.
Labour said on Tuesday that its general secretary had received the “Forde report” into the dossier and was due to take it to an NEC meeting. It has since been published online.
The foreword to the Forde report, published on Tuesday afternoon, said: “The evidence clearly demonstrated that a vociferous faction in the party sees any issues regarding antisemitism as exaggerated by the right to embarrass the left.
“It was of course also true that some opponents of Jeremy Corbyn (below) saw the issue of antisemitism as a means of attacking him.
“Thus, rather than confront the paramount need to deal with the profoundly serious issue of antisemitism in the party, both factions treated it as a factional weapon.”
The foreword also said the investigation found the disciplinary process was “not fit for purpose” and “potentially prone to factional interference”.
“For example, there was a complete lack of any auditable database of cases, which meant the party could not, at any given moment, collate accurate information on the number of complaints which were then pending, or which had been disposed of, and the stage that the live matters had reached,” it said.
However it did say “many aspects of the party’s recent reforms of disciplinary procedures” were to be applauded, and the changes were “generally steps in the right direction”.
The foreword called for “constructive engagement” with the findings in the 138-page review.
“There is a culture of intellectual smugness which exists at the extremes of the political spectrum the party represents,” it said.
“In the past this has led to the dismissal of valid, albeit sometimes uncomfortable, views. It must now come to an end.”
READ MORE: Scottish Labour suspend two councillors for failing to back Tory deal
The report also describes the Labour Party as harbouring a “toxic” atmosphere fuelled by factionalism.
It said: “We understand the intensity of anger amongst many of the membership at the contents of, in particular, the WhatsApp messages cited in the leaked report. Our focus, though, is on how such a toxic situation arose and (more importantly) how it can be avoided in the future.
“One of the tragedies of this period for the party is that so many have lost sight of the humanity of those who they see as being in an opposing faction, which is perhaps easier than ever in an age where so much of our communication takes place at arms-length through a screen.”
The report backed the conclusion of a Labour Together report, which found that the party has “spent substantial periods of the last five years in conflict with itself”.
It said: “We believe there is a clear need for individuals to see and treat each other better, regardless of their political views.”
A party spokesperson said: “The Forde report details a party that was out of control.
“Keir Starmer is now in control and has made real progress in ridding the party of the destructive factionalism and unacceptable culture that did so much damage previously and contributed to our defeat in 2019.”
Initially, the terms of reference said the investigative panel chaired by Forde would “use their best endeavours” to deliver the report to Labour by July 2020, but it has taken two years to come to fruition.
In March this year, Forde wrote to Labour’s general secretary to tell him the content of his review had been finalised, and all that was still needed was “detailed checking for legal and factual accuracy prior to publication”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel