AN independent Scotland would double the UK Government’s international aid allocation, the SNP has said.
The announcement comes one year after Boris Johnson faced down a backbench rebellion and cut the UK’s international aid to 0.5% of national income – despite a manifesto pledge not to do so.
READ MORE: 'Death knell for Global Britain': Aid leaders condemn cut as Tory rebellion fails
The Tories’ 2019 General Election pitch to voters saw them promise to “proudly maintain our commitment to spend 0.7 per cent of GNI [Gross National Income]”.
Dundee West MP Chris Law, the SNP’s shadow secretary for international development, said it was “vital” for the UK Government to reinstate the 0.7% aid budget.
He said the cuts had taken £4 billion from “vulnerable communities and people” around the world.
A policy paper in Law’s name further said that, in an independent Scotland, the 0.7% level of spending would be immediately restored “with a view to increasing that to one per cent in the coming years”.
The paper also said that any plaques celebrating Scotland’s colonial past would be removed.
The SNP said an independent Scotland would address “all Scotland’s colonial crimes by removing/adding plaques that acknowledge the harm . . . [of] that era”.
There would be a decolonisation officer in an independent Scotland’s international development department, and official apologies would be issued to “communities affected” by the actions of Scottish colonisers.
The paper also said that independent Scotland would focus its investment in projects which help empower women and girls.
It said: “By 2035 no less than 95 per cent of indy Scotland’s bilateral international development assistant initiatives will target or integrate gender equality or have a focus on the empowerment of women and girls.”
Law said: "We are one year on from the reckless vote to slash the aid budget by a staggering £4bn and it is vulnerable communities and people that have paid a heavy price.
“Rather than stepping up on the world stage and supporting those in need at a critical time, the UK government shamefully abandoned them.
“The Tory government has cut health and medical funding during a global pandemic. It has cut food programmes during a looming global food security crisis. It has cut environmental projects in the midst of a climate crisis. And it has cut conflict-resolution projects at a time of renewed war. Those deep cuts have likely cost lives.
"If we are to play our part to support communities and protect lives, then it is vital that the UK reinstates the aid budget to 0.7% of GNI."
A UK Government spokesperson told The Times that the UK is still one of the largest global aid donors and spent more than £11 billion in aid in 2021.
They went on: “The government remains committed to spending 0.7 of gross national income on [overseas development aid] once the fiscal situation allows.
“Our international development strategy will help address increasing global challenges, deliver investment, support women and girls, get humanitarian assistance to those who need it most and continue our work on climate change, nature and global health.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel