ENVIRONMENTAL groups have voiced concerns that proposals to build a new golf course at Coul Links in Sutherland could be “environmentally damaging”.
The coalition of groups, consisting of National Trust for Scotland, RSPB Scotland, Scottish Wildlife Trust, Marine Conservation Society, Plantlife, Butterfly Conservation and Buglife previously campaigned over a period of four years when a golf development was initially proposed in this location.
The Scottish Government previously rejected the developer's plans, citing the "significant" negative effects on rare plant life, wintering and breeding birds and the dunes.
However, now the developer C4C has submitted notice to Highland Council, stating they intend to put forward a new planning application for the construction of an 18-hole golf course at Coul Links.
READ MORE: Fight austerity by reconnecting to nature, says Scots environmental writer
C4C claim that changes to the initial design have been made to “address the environmental aspects” which were raised in previous plans, and argue that local people are in favour of the proposals.
However, the environmental coalition stated that they remain “hugely concerned” that irreparable harm would be done to the inhabiting wildlife of the dunes. It said that people “need to learn the lessons” from the irreparable damage caused by Trump International, when a separate golf development was permitted on dunes at Menie in Aberdeenshire.
“Coul Links is a beautiful, natural, coastal dune and one of the last areas of undeveloped species-rich dune habitat in Scotland”, the RSPB stated in a blog on their website.
“Inappropriate development on the site would mean wildlife would no longer be able to freely move between the remaining fragmented pockets of dune habitats.
“Many of the birds and other animals that currently use the site would be scared off by increased and regular human presence and be unlikely to return.
“We are facing a nature and climate emergency. Ensuring damaging developments cannot take place in existing protected areas is critical to addressing this.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel