A MAJOR shift in support for independence will only occur once a referendum campaign begins in earnest, a professional pollster has argued.
This follows the release of a Panelbase poll for the Sunday Times putting support for independence at 48%, with 47% opposed and 5% undecided.
Appearing on the BBC’s Sunday Show, pollster and former Ipsos MORI director Mark Diffley described the survey as “a statistical dead heat”, saying: “We’ve got the two sides running absolutely at 50-50.”
Reflecting on patterns that have emerged from previous polling, Diffley highlighted the negotiation of a hard Brexit and First Minister Nicola Sturgeon’s handling of the Covid-19 pandemic as causes for prior spikes in support for independence.
However, Diffley emphasised the number of undecided or uncertain voters who would be crucial to the outcome of a future referendum and suggested that significant change in levels of support for independence would not occur until campaigning is in full swing, saying: “Everything will come down to the campaign.”
Also appearing on the Sunday Show, Scottish Green co-leader Patrick Harvie welcomed the prospect of a campaign, saying: “So much of the discussion in recent months has been process, process, process – what’s the path? I think now that we have a path, we can move onto the campaign, the issues of substance.”
READ MORE: Plan B: How a ‘de facto indyref2’ will deliver Scottish independence
Commenting on whether or not the Supreme Court would rule in favour of Sturgeon’s preferred route to second independence referendum, Harvie said: “Of course we have to be prepared for both possibilities.
“I think it’s quite clearly preferable that Scotland’s democratic mandate is respected. One of the big questions for the other side in this debate is: if repeated pro-independence majorities in both parliaments isn’t enough for a mandate, what on earth is?”
SNP depute leader Keith Brown welcomed the poll, saying: "The momentum is with the Yes campaign, and support for independence is only likely to grow further when we debate its merits and when the alternative is a broken, failing, corrupt Westminster system.
“When people in Scotland have the opportunity to cast their vote, I'm confident they will choose to escape the damage of Tory cuts, Brexit and Westminster control - and build a fairer, greener and prosperous future as an independent country."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel