A FORMER Scotland secretary has belittled the country saying it would be in a very lonely place after gaining independence.
The comments follow the First Minister Nicola Sturgeon setting out her road map to an independence referendum in Holyrood on Tuesday, declaring a date of October 19, 2023, for a consultative plebiscite.
The bill to set the vote in motion has been referred by the Lord Advocate to the Supreme Court.
READ MORE: Ghislaine Maxwell sentence: Socialite sentenced to 20 years in prison for sex trafficking
Sturgeon’s announcement has prompted both celebration and outrage across the political spectrum in Scotland.
And former cabinet minister Sir Malcolm Rifkind spoke out against Sturgeon's plan on BBC Radio 4, referencing Scotland's population as he talked down the country.
He said: “Now that the United Kingdom is not in the EU, if Scotland breaks away, first of all, it will neither be in the United Kingdom internal market nor the European internal market.
“It could take them years to be accepted as a member of either, so Scotland, little Scotland with five million people, my country of birth, would be in a very, very lonely place, neither able to have a free market with the rest of the UK nor with the European Union, at least for a good number of years.”
He also described Sturgeon’s plans for a second referendum on Scottish independence as a “never-endum” as he made the case against it.
He said: “She has a mandate to ask for a referendum, she doesn’t have a mandate to deserve a referendum.
“You don’t have referendums in countries every few years, until the side that wants independence hope they might one day win. That’s what’s called a never-endum, not a referendum."
Rifkind's political career includes being caught up in a scandal after he was recorded offering access and influence for cash by Channel Four’s Dispatches.
Reporters, posing as Chinese investors, filmed him alongside Jack Straw as the two high-ranking former Foreign Secretaries were asked about a supposed board vacancy.
They were both cleared of wrongdoing after the parliamentary watchdog found "no breach of the rules on paid lobbying".
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel