CONCERNS have been raised about a “lack of import controls” post-Brexit on food safety.
Watchdogs at the Food Standards Agency (FSA) and Food Standards Scotland (FSS) raised the issue in a report which told how the current situation means there is no “official assurance” from the exporting country that items coming into the UK meet its “high standards”.
The UK imports about 40 million tonnes of food from overseas each year, with the EU remaining the biggest supplier – accounting for more than 90% of all beef, dairy, eggs and pork products imported into the UK and nearly two thirds (65%) of all food and feed that doesn’t originate from animals.
READ MORE: Theresa May says 'not legal' NI Protocol Bill will 'diminish' UK reputation
The FSA and FSS stressed there is no evidence the standards of products coming from the European Union have fallen, but they said: “The current situation does reduce our ability to prevent foods that do not meet the UK’s high standards from being placed on our market.”
The report said that despite two years of “major upheaval” following Brexit – notably Covid and the war in Ukraine – food safety standards had largely been maintained during 2021.
However, with safety inspection decreasing in number amid the pandemic, they stressed this conclusion was “cautious”.
Both organisations noted there were “significant risks ahead” and have called on the UK Government to improve controls by the end of 2023. The report also highlighted a lack of qualified professionals to conduct local authority inspections.
Looking at people’s eating habits, the report also said the pandemic had a “mixed impact”, with people preparing healthier meals at home while also indulging more on unhealthy snacks.
Meanwhile, the report said the 4.5% rise in food prices between December 2020 and 2021 was “the greatest annual increase since 2010”.
The annual rise has since increased to 6.7% from April 2021 to 2022 – UK households are now spending an average of £72.45 a week on food.
FSS chair Heather Kelman said it was “encouraging” that high food standards had been maintained, but the “full effects of these momentous events will have an impact for years to come”.
She added: “We are under no illusions there are major challenges ahead. There is a significant issue in relation to local authority resourcing, which could impact the ability to carry out inspections, food law delivery and, at the very core, it could cause a risk to public health.
“Establishing full UK import controls is also an issue which has the potential to not only damage consumer confidence, but ultimately affect the high standards of foods being placed on the market in Scotland and the rest of the UK.”
READ MORE: Government memo reveals Queen's secret influence on Scottish laws
A UK Government spokesperson said: “When the UK left the European Union we regained the right to manage our own borders in a way that works for Britain. This includes how we manage imports into our country from overseas.
“Our new borders strategy will focus on technology to reduce unnecessary costs and delays – which will help businesses and consumers across the UK.
“The controls introduced in January 2021 on the highest risk imports of animals, animal products, plants and plant products will continue to apply in order to safeguard the UK’s biosecurity.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel