DOWNING Street has not refuted claims that Boris Johnson spoke with aides about getting wife Carrie Johnson two top jobs while Prime Minister.
Johnson discussed environmental roles for his wife in autumn 2020, either for the COP26 summit or with the royal family, sources told the Daily Mirror.
The latest claim followed reports Johnson tried to hire her as his chief of staff when he was Foreign Secretary in 2018, which was backed up by the Prime Minister’s former senior aide Dominic Cummings.
The Prime Minister allegedly went on to suggest securing her a role as green ambassador in the run-up to Cop26 or as communications director for the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge’s Earthshot Prize.
Downing Street said he had never recommended Carrie Johnson for a Government role, but stopped short of denying that he considered or discussed the move.
READ MORE: Number 10 spoke to The Times before Carrie Johnson story was dropped, Downing Street admits
The Prime Minister’s official spokesman said: “The Prime Minister has never recommended Mrs Johnson for a Government role, or one as part of the Earthshot Prize.
“Beyond that I wouldn’t get into any conversations the Prime Minister may or may not have had in private.”
The renewed questioning over whether Johnson has wielded his influence to try to secure his now-wife a job came after controversy over the removal of a newspaper report.
The Times first reported on Saturday that Johnson tried to hire his wife in the Foreign Office, but the article was removed from later editions.
READ MORE: Tory summer ball sees Boris Johnson dinner sell for £120,000
Downing Street admitted there were conversations between No 10 and the paper after its initial publication and before it was pulled.
Carrie Johnson’s spokeswoman insisted the allegations in the Times’s story were “totally untrue”.
But the veteran journalist behind the story, Simon Walters, stood by it “100%”, saying he did not receive an on-the-record denial during discussions with No 10 before publication.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel