ONE of the only Scottish Tory MPs not to vote against Boris Johnson has been asked to reveal his “price” for supporting the Prime Minister – after it was revealed at least one confidence vote appeared to have been bought by funding promises.
David Duguid (below), the MP for Banff and Buchan, was the only Scottish Conservative MP other than Alister Jack, Johnson’s Scotland Secretary.
It has led to accusations his support was bought after fellow Johnson-backer Bob Seely, the MP for the Isle of Wight said he only voted to keep the Prime Minister in post after ministers told him they would improve funding for the island.
READ MORE: Boris Johnson 'considering scrapping ethics adviser role', Downing Street says
Karen Adam (below), the SNP MSP for Banffshire and the Buchan Coast said Seely had “gave the game away” and claimed the Government was “buying off” MPs to secure the shaky foundations of Johnson’s support.
The Prime Minister narrowly survived a vote of no-confidence earlier this month, with 41% of his MPs – including all bar two of their Scottish MPs – voting to boot him from office.
Adam said: “Other than Alister Jack – who is on Johnson’s government payroll anyway – Duguid is the only Scots Tory MSP to have backed keeping Johnson in his job.
“And we know - because Bob Seely again gave the game away - that this corrupt Tory Government is no stranger to the worst form of pork-barrel politics.
“So, naturally, my constituents – who are also Duguid’s constituents – will be suspicious of his motivation to defend the indefensible.
“Whatever his price was, it will not be worth it to continue to inflict this disgraceful Prime Minister and his catastrophic policies on the people of Scotland.”
She said that their constituents in the north east of the country were “no less furious than the rest of Scotland over the inexcusable law-breaking behaviour of Boris Johnson”.
“David Duguid must explain why he refused to do the right thing and vote to boot him out,” she added.
READ MORE: ‘Are you awake?’: Tory MSP zones out on live TV as cost-of-living discussed
“UK Government ministers buying off their MPs with promises of tax-payers’ cash is just the latest obscenity in a grotesque catalogue of sleaze and corruption.
“Scotland does not need to continue to put up with Westminster control - we can choose a different path with independence.”
Seely (above) wrote a blog on his website detailing his reasons for voting to keep Johnson as PM, in which he claimed ministers had offered to reassess the funding package for the Isle of Wight council if he voted for the Government.
He said Johnson was “the only one ever to promise an improved funding settlement for the Island”, adding: “As such, and on balance, I would rather continue to focus on getting him to deliver on this commitment than start afresh with a PM who has not made, or may not offer to make, any such offer.”
A row about bribery by Tory chiefs erupted in January this year, after a number of Conservative MPs said party whips had ordered them to vote with the Government or see funding in their constituencies cut.
Johnson claimed he had seen “no evidence” this was the case.
The National has approached Duguid for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel