NICOLA Sturgeon has accused Douglas Ross of not being “a democrat” because he is “terrified” of indyref2.
The First Minister said the Scottish Tory leader was acting in “desperation” by pre-emptively branding the SNP’s plans to hold a second independence referendum in October 2023 “illegal”.
At First Minister’s Questions on Thursday, Ross accused the Scottish Government of being “distracted" by independence and said the focus on constitutional matters was detracting from education, the health service and the country’s drug deaths problem.
READ MORE: Legal expert explains the paths to a Scottish independence referendum
Ross said: “Every time the SNP campaign for another referendum, Scotland’s drug deaths spiral – the First Minister has admitted herself.
“She took her eye off the ball and people lost their lives.”
Earlier in the session, Ross said key issues had “been put on the backburner when they have set a date for an illegal referendum in just 16 months’ time”.
Sturgeon hit back at the claims saying that the Government remained committed to reducing the attainment gap and improving Scotland’s health service.
Rounding on the Tory leaders’ claims about independence, she added: “There is a real desperation at the heart of Douglas Ross’ approach to independence.
“It is very telling that he is so terrified of the substantive debate on independence, so terrified of the verdict of the Scottish people on independence, that he’s reduced to trying to pretend that, somehow, democracy in Scotland is illegal.
“It is not a question of whether this Government respects the rule of law – we do and always will.
READ MORE: Direct ferry link between Scotland and Europe 'set to return in 2023'
“The question is, is Douglas Ross a democrat? And I think that the glaring answer to that is no.”
Ross said now was a “crucial moment for public services and our economy”.
He added: “Scotland has the potential to rebuild stronger. A focus on our recovery is what the Scottish people overwhelmingly want – not a referendum.
“We need a strong government for all of Scotland but we’re getting a weak campaign group for the nationalist minority that values grievance over governance.”
Sturgeon also accused him of “bizarrely” and wrongly claiming she had not mentioned the NHS in her response to his questions about the health service.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel