THE UK Government is preparing a new flight to take asylum seekers to Rwanda after its planned inaugural flight was cancelled following a last-ditch intervention from the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR).
The grounded flight that was set to take off on Tuesday was due to take up to seven people to Rwanda and was chartered at an estimated cost of £500,000.
And following the successful application to the ECHR from lawyers representing asylum seekers to halt the flight, the Government is already preparing a replacement.
Commenting on the ruling, Work and Pensions Secretary Therese Coffey said her government was “surprised and disappointed” but that "lawyers in the Home Office are already working on the next steps".
She added: "I know officials will already be preparing for the next flight."
In its ruling, the ECHR said that an Iraqi man known as KN would face "a real risk of irreversible harm" if he stayed on the flight.
Coffey said that it was important the Government consider the ECHR’s decision but that ministers would “rigorously defend the policy”.
Home Secretary Priti Patel also said she was disappointed by the decision and that “preparation for the next flight begins now”.
“I have always said this policy will not be easy to deliver and am disappointed that legal challenge and last-minute claims have meant today’s flight was unable to depart," she told the media.
“It is very surprising that the European Court of Human Rights has intervened despite repeated earlier success in our domestic courts.
“These repeated legal barriers are similar to those we experience with other removals flights and many of those removed from this flight will be placed on the next.
“We will not be deterred from doing the right thing and delivering our plans to control our nation’s borders."
The lawyer representing the lead case before the ECHR, Geoffrey Robertson QC, said: "One of the things that makes Britain great … is that we will abide by international courts and international law."
The ECHR, based in Strasbourg, is not a body under the European Union but is an organ of the Council of Europe, of which the UK is still a member.
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon: Indyref2 to be held with or without Section 30 order
Speaking to the BBC, Robertson said the Government would have a variety of choices in its bid to get around the decision, including asking the ECHR to lift the measure, contesting the judicial review or passing a new law in Parliament.
He also said that “lawyers at many chambers” appealed to the ECHR over the case and that it had decided the Government should suspend deportations "until the judicial review had concluded and had approved the lawfulness of the policy".
Robertson added: "So it shouldn't have come as any surprise to the Government because it's well known that when domestic remedies in the British courts are exhausted you can go to the European court."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel