AN SNP MP has insisted the Scottish Government "have in their minds" a route to a legal referendum if Boris Johnson decides not to grant a Section 30 order.
Stewart Hosie, MP for Dundee East, said the "cleanest" way of asking Scots whether they want to leave the UK would be through a temporary transfer of powers from Westminster to Holyrood as happened in 2014.
But he said he felt "confident" the Scottish Government has a plan B and insisted there is a "different route" if the Prime Minister decides "not to be a democrat".
It comes after Nicola Sturgeon and Greens co-leader Patrick Harvie fired the starting gun on a new independence campaign on Tuesday with the release of the first in a series of papers making the case for Scotland outside the UK.
When asked how the Scottish Government intend to get a lawful referendum, Hosie told BBC Scotland's The Nine: "First thing to say is, the Section 30 order, that temporary transfer of powers, is the cleanest and quickest way to do it.
"But I'm extremely confident indeed that if Boris Johnson decides not to be a democrat but to be a despot, then the Scottish Government have in their minds a mechanism to lead us to a legal referendum without a Section 30 order.
READ MORE: Lorraine Kelly calls out Boris Johnson over ITV interview refusal
"There will be a referendum on Scotland's future whether Boris Johnson says yes or whether he says no."
Hosie was then asked when a Section 30 request would be made.
He replied: "I'm not sure exactly what the timing is in that regard, but clearly they will make the request.
"I hope at that point the UK Government see sense, and they decide not to carve themselves out of any debate over Scotland's future.
"But if they don't then there is a different route and I'm confident the Scottish Government will take it and the referendum will be held."
Sturgeon said on Tuesday a referendum will be held with or without a Section 30 order. She intends to hold a vote next year.
Scottish Tory leader Douglas Ross said yesterday he would boycott any "wildcat" referendum that is held without consent from Westminster.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel