A SECOND Scottish independence referendum should not be held until 2039 at the earliest, according to a UK Government minister.
Commons Leader Mark Spencer told MPs a time gap of nearer 25 years is required before the matter should be considered again following the first vote in 2014.
It comes after the Scottish Government published its opening documents in support of independence on Tuesday morning.
The 72-page book was published on the Government's website, as First Minister Nicola Sturgeon spoke at its official launch at Bute House.
Speaking in response to an update to UK parliamentary business, SNP Commons leader Pete Wishart said: “There’s one very significant statement that’s happened here in the UK today and that happened in Bute House Scotland, the First Minister’s office, where we have indicated our intention to get out of this trail of devastation that is the United Kingdom and become a country of our own.
“That process has started, that debate is now engaged and by God are we going to win that one.”
READ MORE: Indyref2 to be held with or without Section 30 order, says Sturgeon
But Conservative MP John Baron later said: “In answer to the SNP’s question, we should remind them that they cannot be trusted because when we last had a referendum with regards the union we were assured by the SNP that that would be a once-in-a-lifetime, generational choice.
“They cannot be trusted.”
Spencer replied: “[Baron] makes an interesting observation – once-in-a-generation I think is certainly not five years, I think that would be more nearer to 25 years before it should be considered again.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel