A HUNG parliament is “the best Labour can hope for” from a UK General Election, polling expert Professor John Curtice has said.
Curtice, who is the president of the British Polling Council, said that a Westminster election would likely see Keir Starmer have to strike a deal with either the SNP or the LibDems in order to put himself in Downing Street.
Starmer has repeatedly ruled out a deal with the SNP in an attempt to shore up his party's Unionist credentials, meaning the LibDems may be his only real option.
Labour face an uphill battle in attempting to win back seats from the Tories in the so-called “Red Wall” as well as taking seats from the SNP in Scotland, Curtice said.
“The truth is, being the largest party in a hung Parliament is pretty much the best [that Starmer] can hope for,” the professor went on.
READ MORE: Keir Starmer should rule out indyref2 and working with SNP, Labour veterans say
“And then he faces the question: will he do a deal with the Liberal Democrats and the SNP, both of which will present him with some very fundamental choices …
“But at the end of the day, history suggests that when people get faced with a choice between becoming prime minister and losing their position as leader of their party, they tend to make the former choice.”
Labour's relative success in recent polls has been widely ascribed more to the Conservatives' failures than to their own successes.
Curtice was speaking to former Northern Ireland first minister Arlene Foster on GB News when he made the comments.
He also addressed the partygate scandal engulfing Boris Johnson, saying that the beleaguered Prime Minister might not be out of the woods yet.
“Well, he’s survived Partygate so far but of course it’s not over,” Curtice said.
“Not least because the Committee on Standards and Privileges is now investigating the statements the Prime Minister made in the House of Commons when on a number of occasions about partygate – suggesting initially there’re weren’t any parties and that he'd been assured that all the regulations had been adhered to, both statements of which are now open to debate …
“Partygate itself is not over. I think in truth if the committee on privileges were to suggest that the Prime Minister had been less than straightforward in the House of Commons, but that might in the end be enough to turn around enough Conservative MPs.”
Johnson survived a no-confidence vote on Monday by 211 votes to 148. The loss of the support of 41% of his MPs was seen as a crushing blow, but Johnson claimed it was a “decisive” victory and vowed to continue on.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel