RISHI Sunak has suggested it is impossible to stop second home owners from benefitting from energy bill support.
The Chancellor faced a grilling at the Treasury Committee from Labour MP Siobhain McDonagh over the issue as she outlined 772,000 households would receive £620 million of help with their energy costs despite owning two homes.
Sunak announced all British households would receive a £400 payment from October to help offset the soaring increase in energy bills.
Every household with a domestic electricity connection will be automatically eligible for the grant.
This means those with more than one property will get another £400 for every home they own.
Sunak claimed there was no way to stop those with more than one property from benefitting from help they don't really need because the support package is universal.
READ MORE: Pressure on Douglas Ross as Scottish Tories slam Boris Johnson
He told the committee: "There will be some people who don’t need the help. That is unfortunately the consequence of having to do policy in practical terms and I think we were talking about providing support on a more universal basis.
"So assuming you [McDonagh] agree with that, which you may not, but if you do agree that you need to provide support on a more universal basis then you have to think how best can we do that."
McDonagh - who outlined there were 61,000 people who own three properties and would get £1200 of help for this - then asked Sunak how much help he was going to get with his energy bills.
Sunak has said he will be donating any support he gets to charity, but McDonagh then accused him of being "philanthropic with other people's money".
She said: "That’s very philanthropic, but isn’t it philanthropic with other people’s money?
"As Mrs Thatcher said, there is no such thing as government money, there’s only taxpayer money.
READ MORE: When will we know result of Boris Johnson's no confidence vote?
"At a time when the total tax burden has risen to the highest level since the 1940s, is it really good use of taxpayers' money for somebody on the Sunday Times Rich List or indeed for any MP to be receiving second home support when others are choosing between heating and eating?"
Sunak replied: "I think the Labour policy was a VAT cut which would have done the same thing or potentially even more so because it’s linked directly to the size of your energy bills so that would equally apply to that policy and that’s the challenge with universal policies."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here