THE Metropolitan Police have attempted to justify why officers overlooked parties in Downing Street during lockdown which were later found to have broken the law.
Stephen House, the acting commissioner of the Met, was hauled before the London Assembly on Thursday to explain the force’s investigation into widespread lawbreaking in the heart of power during the pandemic.
Sue Gray’s damning report into parties in No 10 and Whitehall included a passage detailing how a police officer had been alerted to a party after a member of staff accidentally triggered a panic alarm but took no action to break up the gathering.
READ MORE: Boris Johnson clings to power despite damning Sue Gray report
House, a former Police Scotland Chief Constable, insisted “the decisions my officers made were based on the facts and were proper”, ITV News reports.
"I think it's impossible to expect an officer to walk through a room of people and conclude whether regulations were being breached, when it's taken 12 experienced detectives to work that out" says Sir Stephen.
— Paul Brand (@PaulBrandITV) May 26, 2022
But did the rest of us need 12 detectives to tell us the rules?
In response to questions over the panic alarm incident, House said: “They walked through a couple of rooms and saw a couple of people. The officer did not engage.
“I think it's impossible to expect an officer to walk through a room of people and conclude whether regulations were being breached, when it's taken 12 experienced detectives to work that out.”
The party in question took place on December 18, 2020 and was held to mark officials’ Christmas break.
READ MORE: Johnson takes 'full responsibility' for partygate - then puts blame on junior staff
The event did result in fines in the force’s belated investigation into Downing Street partying.
House told the Assembly: “I think it's impossible to expect an officer to walk through a room of people and conclude whether regulations were being breached, when it's taken 12 experienced detectives to work that out.”
He insisted that Met officers permanently stationed outside the Prime Minister’s home are there to guard the building and its inhabitants but not to police what goes on inside.
Suspicions are growing Scotland Yard was "nobbled" in investigating Downing Street lawbreaking.
Joanna Cherry QC, the SNP MP for Edinburgh South West, said in parliament on Wednesday: "Neither I nor my Edinburgh South West constituents would wish to live in a state where the Government of the day can influence the police in the exercise of their duty to investigate without fear or favour, so we are puzzled as to why the Prime Minister did not receive questionnaires in respect of three gatherings for which other people in No 10 received questionnaires.
"We are also puzzled as to why the ABBA party in the Prime Minister’s flat has never been investigated by either Sue Gray or the Metropolitan police.
"What can be done by way of an independent investigation to assure me and my constituents that the Metropolitan police have not been nobbled?"
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel