THE Attorney General has defended efforts to block the identification of an MI5 agent said to have exploited his status to terrorise and attack his girlfriend.
Suella Braverman told MPs she was “very pleased” that an injunction is in place following a Government application, given there are “national security interests” involved.
Labour criticised the injunction and demanded a “fuller investigation” on the case.
Shadow solicitor general Andy Slaughter told the Commons: “In January, the Attorney General told the House that this Government takes tackling domestic abuse and hate crime extremely seriously.
“So why has she spent the months since then taking the BBC through the High Court to protect an MI5 informant who attacked one partner with a machete and who another partner predicted will kill a woman if he is not challenged and exposed?
“One of his victims is now taking her case to the Investigatory Powers Tribunal, but doesn’t this demand a fuller investigation?
“Rather than disregard the interests of domestic violence victims where the security services are involved, will the Attorney General support an inquiry by the Intelligence and Security Committee into the handling of this case and whether it raises wider concerns that agents are able to use their status to evade criminal responsibility?”
The injunction remains in place preventing the BBC from disclosing information likely to identify the man, referred to only as “X”, who is said to be a covert human intelligence source.
Braverman replied: “Of course any allegation of domestic abuse or sexual assault on victims is horrendous and on no account does anyone in this Government condone that behaviour.
“I was very pleased with the result of the court on our application for an injunction because there are national security interests which are vital to be balanced in any matter.”
Braverman went on to say the Government is taking “huge steps” to support victims of domestic abuse.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel