FOLLOWING accusations it was paying its staff "less than minimum wage", Buckingham Palace has said a job advertising an hourly rate of just £7.97 was "published in error".
The Royal Household advertised a housekeeping role that paid £1.53 less than the national minimum wage for those aged more than 23.
The meagre rate prompted anger from Unite the Union and anti-monarchy group Republic, with the salary being labelled a "disgrace".
Employers are legally allowed to pay below the minimum wage if they provide accommodation. The accommodation charge would then be used to calculate a different minimum wage.
The ad for the job with the royal household states that accommodation is provided, along with free meals - though these do not factor into the wage.
READ MORE: Queen to 'help Prince Andrew pay £12m sex assault case settlement'
The royal job ad, which is for “the master of the household’s office” at Buckingham Palace states that the hourly rate is calculated “after the salary adjustment for accommodation”.
The application describes the hourly rate as "competitive".
Candidates were told the role could be based at Buckingham Palace or Windsor Castle.
The job ad states the successful applicant will “upkeep, clean and care for a wide range of interiors and items, ensuring they’re presented to their very best”.
It adds that the employee will “welcome and take care of guests at functions and events too”.
The worker will be "delivering extraordinary service in incredible surroundings" while developing " housekeeping skills and expertise".
It adds that previous housekeeping or hospitality experience would be an advantage.
Unite Hospitality hit out at the job, calling the wage “obscene”. It said it showed how workers, often migrants who are women, are exploited.
A Unite Hospitality spokesperson told The National: "For one of the richest landowners in the country to be paying workers below the minimum wage is obscene.
“This case serves to highlight the rampant exploitation of migrant domestic workers allowed through the lack of legislative protections which allow rich households to abuse and exploit mostly migrant women workers.
“We would encourage Her Majesty to become a living wage employer and to sign up to our Fair Hospitality Charter to ensure Buckingham Palace workers are treated fairly.”
Commenting, a spokesperson for activist group Republic told The National: “When it comes to spending money on the royals, no expense is spared. When it comes to spending money on their staff it seems that they will aim for the lowest salaries possible. This is a disgraceful way to treat staff, especially during a cost of living crisis and especially in London where costs are so high.
“The monarchy costs the taxpayer at least £345m a year, the equivalent to 13,000 new police officers or nurses. The Queen herself receives a personal income of more than £20m a year. It is beyond belief that they cannot offer salaries that are generous and well above the living wage.”
A Buckingham Palace spokesperson told The National: “The hourly rate in the advert was published in error.
"The full remuneration package for this role includes the offer of accommodation and meals, which makes the offer very competitive for similar roles in London.”
Following The National's report, the website removed the hourly figure, before later adding a yearly starting salary of "£19,909 per annum" to the job description.
It adds that "this position offers an option to live-in (for which there is a salary adjustment) with meals provided".
READ MORE: Anger as Alan Titchmarsh compares the Queen to Nelson Mandela
The Queen receives a sovereign grant from the UK Government of around £85 million a year, the equivalent of £1.29 per person in the UK.
Most of this is spent on official duties, including staff wages, and goes to maintaining occupied royal palaces including Buckingham Palace, Windsor Castle and Kensington Palace.
As well as this, the Queen makes a private income from the Queen's Privy Purse, money from a private estate known as the Duchy of Lancaster. This covers 18,000 hectares of land and in the year ending March 2021 made a profit of £21m.
The monarch also makes a private income from Balmoral, which she owns personally.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel