THE entire executive committee of Wakefield’s local Labour group has resigned in a row over the party’s candidate selection for an upcoming by-election.
The constituency Labour Party’s executive say they are quitting en masse in protest at the lack of a local candidate after three people, including the council's deputy leader, were kept off the shortlist.
Members have also accused the National Executive Committee (NEC) of allegedly not keeping to the party’s rules about by-elections.
A statement from the Wakefield Constituency Labour Party (CLP) said: “We asked for local candidates, but there are none.
READ MORE: Keir Starmer: Are Tories pressuring police to use 'beergate' against their rivals
“Three prominent council and local Labour candidates, including the deputy council leader didn’t even make it onto the ‘long list’.
“A short list of four was requested by our representative on the panel to give members some choice but the NEC members insisted on just two.”
It added: “Representations to Party Officials at the highest level have got absolutely nowhere with some queries not even answered.
“As a consequence, the constituency executive (comprised of local branch representatives and constituency officers) decided last night to resign en bloc with effect from the Sunday selection meeting.”
They also said the party’s rulebook states that the five-person selection panel should include three people chosen by the local Labour Party, with one each from the NEC and the Yorkshire region.
The CLP said: “The NEC simply reversed this, with three from the NEC itself plus one for region and one local (which had to be female).
“The rules say there should be a week between publication of shortlist and the vote, so members can find out about the candidates and a chance to think about their choice.
“The NEC have given two clear days.”
The final two candidates are Community union’s Kate Dearden, from Bradford, and NHS worker Simon Lightwood, a member of Labour’s national policy forum.
One source from within the Wakefield CLP accused the national party of failing to listen to the views of local members and residents.
They voiced concerns that the two final candidates had previously been Remainers. Wakefield voted to leave the EU by more than 60%.
They said: “Neither of them are from the district and members are very disappointed at the process and the lack of engagement. It’s about listening to members, listening to residents.
“It seemed very clear from the beginning they didn’t want a local candidate. They pushed very heavily.
“Why should we give up hours and hours of our time voluntarily to campaign when our wants and needs aren’t being taken into consideration?”
READ MORE: Beergate: Nicola Sturgeon dismisses Tory fury at Keir Starmer
A Labour Party spokesperson said: “We’re really pleased to have two fantastic candidates on the shortlist with strong connections to the local community.
“On Sunday, local members will make the final choice on a candidate who will be a strong champion for Wakefield and represent a fresh start against a backdrop of Tory failure.
“Wakefield has been badly let down by the Conservatives and our focus is on winning the by-election and ensuring local people in Wakefield get the representation and the hard working MP they deserve.”
The national party said the process of choosing a candidate had followed NEC guidance, used in other recent by-elections including Erdington and North Shropshire.
The by-election follows the resignation of Conservative MP Imran Ahmad Khan after his conviction for sexually assaulting a boy.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel