JACOB Rees-Mogg has claimed the EU is trying to make the UK “feel bad” about Brexit – as Unionists in Northern Ireland refuse to engage in government until their demands on the protocol are met.
The ninety members of the new Northern Ireland Assembly – the majority of whom support the protocol – were due to meet on Friday to elect a speaker. However, the DUP is refusing to co-operate in protest at the Brexit deal agreed by the Tory Government.
They oppose Boris Johnson’s post-Brexit treaty because of the economic barriers it creates between Northern Ireland and the rest of the UK, despite overt promises from the Prime Minister that it would do no such thing.
READ MORE: View from the EU: The UK is ruining its international reputation pandering to its pro-Brexit base
The mess has led the US to intervene, strongly implying in a letter to Foreign Secretary Liz Truss that it would send a special envoy to Northern Ireland. US congressmen told the UK Government to “uphold your end of the deal and act in good faith, within the parameters of international law”.
They added that the “worst outcome of Brexit would be one that lead to violence and upheaval in Northern Ireland”.
The DUP had previously indicated that it would not nominate for the position of deputy first minister, which will prevent the forming of a new executive, as part of its protest against the protocol.
Now, DUP leader Jeffrey Donaldson (below) has said his party will not back a speaker, which will leave the Assembly unable to function.
The elections held last week saw Donaldson’s party lose in historic fashion to the republican Sinn Fein, which became the largest party at Stormont.
Sinn Fein vice-president and prospective first minister Michelle O’Neill described the move as “disgraceful”, and Alliance leader Naomi Long said it was “incredibly frustrating”.
O’Neill accused the DUP of “disgracefully holding the public to ransom for their Brexit mess”.
“Today is the day we should be forming an Executive to put money in people’s pockets and to start to fix our health service,” she added. “The DUP have confirmed they will punish the public and not turn up.”
UK ministers have been increasingly hinting that they could take unilateral action on the protocol, with Johnson arguing the Good Friday Agreement is more important than the Brexit deal which Tories previously claimed would protect it.
European leaders have warned the UK not to make the incendiary move, amid fears it could provoke a trade war with Britain’s largest trading partner.
Rees-Mogg, the Minister for Brexit Opportunities, told GB News: “I think [the EU] wants to make the UK feel bad about having left the European Union and that underpins its whole policy and it doesn’t really mind about the consequences of that.
“We are an independent country, and what the EU wants and thinks is secondary. To cancel the TCA [EU-UK Trade and Co-operation Agreement], the European Union would need unanimity, and it seems to me that’s a pretty high bar to get.”
However, Ireland’s Foreign Affairs Minister Simon Coveney has insisted that the UK Government would be acting in an “anti-democratic” way if it goes through with its threat to override elements of the post-Brexit treaty.
Coveney said the EU wanted to implement the protocol with “flexibility and pragmatism” to take account of Unionist concerns.
He told BBC Radio Four: “What is being looked for in Northern Ireland, from business people and many in the unionist community, what they want is to ensure that trade within the United Kingdom is facilitated and checks are removed when possible on goods that are staying in Northern Ireland.
“That is what the EU Commission wants to resolve but unfortunately they can’t do that if they don’t have a partner and there is a lot going on this week in the context of ratcheting up language, increasing tension unnecessarily between the UK and the EU.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel