A VETERAN Labour peer has been suspended from the House of Lords after he was found to have bullied a member of security staff.
The sanction against former Labour MP Tom Pendry was imposed with immediate effect after the upper chamber approved a report by the Conduct Committee.
The Lords’ watchdog rejected an appeal by the 87-year-old and backed the findings of the standards commissioner who, following an investigation, upheld the complaint that the peer had breached the code of conduct with his behaviour.
Pendry was found to have been “verbally aggressive” and exhibited “intimidating behaviour” to the security guard, who had challenged an unescorted guest in Parliament last July.
The guard, who served in the Army, described being left “physically shaken and unnerved” after the “angry” peer challenged them and allegedly grabbed their radio during “a little bit of a tussle”.
Pendry conceded he had “ticked off forcibly” the guard, but noted staff were “flexing their muscles” against politicians in a manner he had not seen in his 50 years in Parliament.
Speaking in the Lords, chair of the conduct committee Eliza Manningham-Buller said: “The report upholds the findings of the commissioner for standards that Lord Pendry breached the code of conduct by bullying a member of staff in the parliamentary security department.
“The committee considered an appeal by Lord Pendry against this finding but unanimously dismissed it.
“The report recommends that Lord Pendry be suspended from the service of this House for a period of one week.
“The committee agreed with the commissioner that the sentence of suspension was proportionate and necessary in response to Lord Pendry’s conduct and the effect it had on the complainant.”
In making his finding, barrister Akbar Khan, one of the Lords’ standards commissioners, said he had to take into account the aggravating factor that Pendry “continues to believe that his actions were proportionate and justified, along with his refusal to acknowledge the power imbalance that existed between him and a member of the House staff”.
“In so doing, I find he has shown little insight or contrition in respect of his conduct or its impact on the complainant,” he added.
The guard told Khan they had been “shocked and upset” by the altercation.
They said they suffer anxiety and post-traumatic stress disorder as a result of their time in the Army, as well as depression, and the incident “had set them back a lot, just as they were getting on top of managing it all”.
Responding to his suspension, Pendry said: “This is a travesty of justice. I am not a bully and I object to that being a stain on my character.”
He added: “The conduct system is not fit for the purpose it was designed and should be overhauled.
“I am deeply unhappy with the way the investigation was conducted.”
Pendry was an MP for Stalybridge and Hyde in Greater Manchester for 31 years before being made a Labour peer in 2001.
He became a non-affiliated member following the publication of the committee’s report.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel