THE author of Labour’s 2017 General Election manifesto has accused the party’s Scottish branch of attempting to “sabotage” the campaign.
Andrew Fisher, who was Labour’s executive director of policy under Jeremy Corbyn, claimed an internal probe had found that the manifesto was leaked to the right-wing press before it was officially published.
The 2017 election saw Theresa May’s Conservatives lose the narrow majority David Cameron had won in 2015 while Labour gained 30 seats.
Corbyn’s Labour made manifesto commitments to nationalise the railways, energy, and postal service and to introduce a pay cap on firms given government contracts.
Fisher, who led the writing of the manifesto, said its leaking to the press before the official release was something which “had never happened before in British electoral history”.
He wrote on Twitter: “The Daily Mirror and Daily Telegraph had the manifesto, and were going to publish it.
“I had been working over 100 hours a week, non-stop writing, editing and negotiating – alongside a brilliant team doing similarly “I was gutted and angry, wondering ‘HOW?’”
Fisher said that a probe into the source of the leak eventually turned up just two possibilities, that either Scottish or Welsh Labour had given it to the press.
“I was later told by the senior Labour staffer who investigated that the leak had come from the Scottish Labour office,” he wrote.
“The leak was an attempt to sabotage the party, and the headlines the next morning reflected that …”
We wouldn't find out for weeks, but I was later told by the senior Labour staffer who investigated that the leak had come from the Scottish Labour office.
— Andrew Fisher (@FisherAndrew79) May 10, 2022
The leak was an attempt to sabotage the party, and the headlines the next morning reflected that ... pic.twitter.com/Dd0CJPKJuS
Fisher shared images of the front pages of the Daily Mail and the Telegraph, which both carried the story along with similar headlines claiming Corbyn aimed to “drag [the UK] back to the 1970s”.
He added: “As acts of sabotage go, it probably backfired more than any other in political history. It generated massive coverage and discussion of radical and interesting policy.”
Scottish Labour was led by Kezia Dugdale at the time of the leak.
The party has been approached for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel