PRINCE Charles made a plea for the Union on behalf of Her Majesty’s Government as he delivered Tuesday’s Queen’s Speech.
The Duke of Rothesay provided the address during the State Opening of Parliament after the Queen pulled out at the last minute, missing the ceremony for the first time in nearly 60 years.
The 96-year-old monarch was said to be following advice from her doctors after experiencing “episodic mobility problems”.
The Government writes the speech setting out plans for the upcoming parliamentary session despite it being read out by the Head of State – in Tuesday’s address, Boris Johnson used it to announce a blueprint to get the UK “back on track” after the pandemic, but failed to offer up any new legislation to ease the spiralling cost of living crisis.
Neutrality from the Royals? 🤔 'The continued success and integrity of the United Kingdom is of paramount importance to her Majesty's Government' pic.twitter.com/ohvGvst6ee
— The National (@ScotNational) May 10, 2022
Among the 38 Bills in the programme, there was absolutely nothing to alleviate consumers’ soaring household expenses right now.
Another key point during the address was when the speech was used to make a statement on the stability of the Union.
Following historic wins for the pro-independence SNP in Scotland and pro-reunification Sinn Fein in Northern Ireland at last week’s elections, the Government effectively responded to that success through Prince Charles.
“The continued success and integrity of the whole of the United Kingdom is of paramount importance to her majesty’s government,” he told the House of Lords, “including the internal economic bonds between all of its parts”.
He went on to say that the Government will continue to support the Good Friday Agreement too.
Last Friday, Sinn Fein became Northern Ireland's largest party and won the entitlement to nominate a first minister.
Meanwhile the SNP's seat tally increased by 22 to 453, with First Minister Nicola Sturgeon hailing the victory for her party as “astonishing”.
READ MORE: Declaration of Arbroath to go back on display during indyref2 year - prompting Tory anger
Tommy Sheppard, SNP MP and the party's constitution spokesperson, told The National that the Unionist element of the speech was disappointing.
"Instead of defending archaic institutions from yesteryear the Government would do better to address the democratic desire of people in various parts of the UK to have a say on a new relationship between its component nations.
"Disappointed not to hear any fresh thinking or a commitment to respect the views of people in Scotland."
Scottish Greens economic spokesperson Maggie Chapman (below) went on: "The speech talked about the 'continued success and integrity of the whole of the United Kingdom' but the reality is that few people are sharing-in that so-called success. The cost of living is skyrocketing and people are suffering."
And Alba MP, Kenny MacAskill criticised the "direct political reference" given to Charles by "that complete chancer, Johnson".
"A constitutional monarch should never be making political statements. Charles’s advisers should have flung the draft back in the Prime Minster’s face as 'foolish and divisive'," he told The National.
“This reference was probably to Northern Ireland but, of course, former Tory prime minister Cameron has already admitted to attempting to prejudice the monarch’s impartiality during the Scottish independence referendum.
“The monarchy cannot possibly survive when it allows itself to be used as a political cats-paw by the Tories. It re-enforces my view that once the reign of the much respected present Queen comes to an end then the monarchy itself will have past its sell by date.”
The Queen's Speech comes after it emerged that royal family members will be sent to Scotland to celebrate the upcoming Jubilee.
Princess Anne will head north of the Border as part of efforts to “spread joy” and “shore up the Union”, according to the Scottish Daily Express.
The royal visits follow reports that the Queen wants to spend more time in Scotland to strengthen support for the Union.
She is said to have informed palace insiders she does not want to see Scotland leave the UK under her watch – with another independence referendum scheduled for 2023.
A royal source told the Sun on Sunday: “Protocol prevents her from expressing a political opinion but she wants the people of Scotland to know of her wish that they reject independence.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel