THE deputy leader of the SNP in Westminster has said Scotland does not need the Tories’ permission to hold indyref2.
Kirsten Oswald said her party had a mandate to hold another referendum and suggested there was a “real appetite” for independence on the back of the SNP coming out as the biggest party in Scotland in the local elections.
Speaking on the Sunday Show, Oswald denied that Scotland was “stuck” on the constitutional question.
She said: “I don’t think we’re stuck at all. It does certainly send a clear signal that people have a real appetite to look to the future and to that better future that independence will bring and I look forward to more conversation about that very shortly.
READ MORE: Support for independence referendum hits 55 per cent, suggests poll
“But it’s a mistake for anybody to suggest that we’re stuck. People in Scotland are entitled to their democratically held views.”
Oswald hit back at the challenge the Conservatives in England would not grant a second referendum.
“It’s not for the Conservatives to say we’re not having a referendum,” she said.
“I think we are absolutely on the move towards a referendum and the First Minister has been very clear on our position in terms of timing and what we’d like to see and we have a mandate for that as well, don’t forget.
“I really do look forward to things cranking up, in terms of that conversation. It’s not democratically possible for the Conservatives to keep suggesting that this won’t happen. It’s not up to them, it’s up to the people in Scotland.”
But some in the independence movement were unhappy with her answer, claiming she had dodged the question of whether a referendum would be held according to Nicola Sturgeon’s timetable which commits Scotland to a second vote by 2024.
Neal Hanvey, Alba MP, said: “In the run-up to the local elections the SNP were firm that there would be a referendum next year as they have promised. Now two days later there is an entire lexicon of excuses and evasions.”
It comes after a fresh poll found 55% of Scots backed a second vote and that support for independence stood at 49% if undecideds were excluded.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel