SCOTTISH author Billy Kay has spoken out over the abuse he has received for speaking in Scots, saying the “hatred has been hard for my children”.
The writer and broadcaster received support for his historic Scots speech in Holyrood, becoming the first person to present the Time for Reflection address to MSPs in the language.
But his appearance led to a barrage of abuse from those who took issue with Scots being deemed a language.
Some users accused Kay of speaking a “made up” language, branding him an “embarrassment”, while others claimed Scots was “gibberish” and one senior Labour member commented: “Literally nobody in Scotland speaks like this. What a clown.”
Thread. 1 week ago, I gave this Time for Reflection – a moment of immense pride for me and my family. The reaction was positive from people who actually watched it & extremely negative from North Britons who act like snarlin dugs when exposed to Scots https://t.co/V8GiJNrRCN
— Billy Kay (@billykayscot) May 3, 2022
Tweeting about the abuse, the Scots language campaigner said: “One week ago, I gave this Time for Reflection – a moment of immense pride for me and my family. The reaction was positive from people who actually watched it & extremely negative from North Britons who act like snarlin dugs when exposed to Scots.
READ MORE: Attacks on Billy Kay's Scots speech prove why it was so necessary
“The abuse was at low life level, like the lad who replied to my tweet in Scots, ‘In English, ya Tadger!’
“When you put your head above the parapet & promote confident national & international Scottishness, you get used to such vitriol. The hatred though was hard for my children.”
Kay vowed to continue speaking in and campaigning for Scots, saying his speech proved the language can be used in a formal setting.
He continued: “They, like me are confident multi-lingual Europeans who cannot conceive of people wanting to suppress and negate a language of such expressive power and with such a rich and brilliant literary history. So we will continue to sing it loud, we’re Scots and we’re proud.
“I showed that Scots can be used effectively in a formal setting. Please join me in doing the same on any occasion you can. Like every other minority language – tak tent or it’s tint – use it or we’ll lose it. Thank you for the support and the love.”
Thenks tae awbody that gied me support for the speech at the Pairliament - ower monie tae thenk personally. As for the trolls & Scots deniers, here's Burns
— Billy Kay (@billykayscot) April 27, 2022
The mair they talk, I'm kent the better,
E'en let them clash;
An auld wife's tongue's a feckless matter
To gie ane fash. pic.twitter.com/6BdOLChl20
It comes after Kay was caught in a back and forth with Labour life peer George Foulkes, who replied to the Sunday National’s interview with the Scottish writer, claiming “there is no ‘Scots language’”.
Foulkes’ post prompted outrage, with several writers and academics saying his claim that Scots was a dialect and not a language was false.
READ MORE: Billy Kay hits back as Unionist trolls attack him for speaking Scots in Holyrood
The Labour politician said: “There is no 'Scots language'. Having been brought up in Keith speaking English in the Doric dialect & then Edinburgh & Ayrshire with two different dialects of English I can confirm they have similarities but also major differences but all with the same English grammar.”
Kay himself responded to the post, saying it was while Foulkes was part of the Tony Blair administration that the UK Government officially recognised Scots as a language.
He said: “George, comment on stuff you know something about. The UK Government signed up for the European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages giving official recognition for Scots back in 2000. It was ratified by the Labour Prime Minister Tony Blair in 2001.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel