SNP Westminster leader Ian Blackford has urged the Scottish independence movement to rediscover a “sense of purpose” and argued that independence could be an alternative to Boris Johnson’s “threat to democracy.”
Speaking to the think tank Business for Scotland, Blackford described Westminster as still behaving “as if it was a gentleman’s club.”
Blackford said: “The rules are not fit for purpose, so everything that's happened is really based on the issue that it is a club that’s not fit for purpose, and it's certainly not representative of the interests of the people of Scotland.”
Commenting on the state of the independence movement, Blackford explained there now exists a sense of urgency, more than half-way through the Westminster session and a year into the current Scottish parliamentary term.
“My message to the [independence] movement is that we need to have that sense of purpose,” Blackford said. “Talking about what a new Scotland should look like, the values that we want to see in an independent Scotland and what kind of country we want to be.
“I hope that once the local elections are out the way, we can really get on to do that, because it's about really persuading people to come with us.
“In the end, what’s going to deliver independence isn't a debate on process - it’s people in Scotland demanding that they wish Scotland to be an independent country, and they see the future as an independent country and one that’s back in Europe. And it's away from everything that’s going on.”
Addressing recent controversies within Westminster, Blackford also commented: “You can talk about the misogyny and the sexism, but you've got at the core a government that's rotten, a government that’s corrupt, and one where the normal rules, normal laws that the public has to follow are not always there.”
READ MORE: Tories and Labour accused of covering up coalition in West Lothian on Wikipedia
Referring to Boris Johnson, Blackford added: “If you look at it in the context of the UK for just a second, he’s a threat to democracy because he’s undermining and abusing that power of Prime Minister.
“Of course in Scotland, for us there’s an alternative.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel