THE SNP have come up with an unusual strategy to defeat Tory rivals in a Scottish council ballot.
The party is sending targeted campaign leaflets to Labour voters in Montrose. It’s urging them to stick with Anas Sarwar’s party, while encouraging them to select the SNP as their second and third choices in the vote for Angus Council. Although the ploy contradicts official SNP voting advice, local activists hope it will help prevent Tories from regaining control of the council.
The SNP are the largest group in Angus Council, with nine councillors. But the Conservatives, who won eight seats in 2017, currently run the administration along with LibDem and independent representatives.
Labour, who didn’t win any seats, have a poor election record in the area.
Under the STV system used in council elections, voters are able to rank their favoured candidates on the ballot paper.
READ MORE: Can the SNP depose the scandal-ridden Tory trolls running Angus council?
The SNP leaflet reads: “Angus Council has no representation from Scottish Labour and the council is divided between representatives of the SNP and the Conservative/Independent administration.
“The majority of the current administration hold right-wing views and are unsympathetic towards those in our society who are struggling.
“If you are intending to vote Labour in this election then we simply wish to invite you to consider giving your second and third preferences to our SNP candidates.”
Labour candidate John Ruddy shared the letter, quipping “even the SNP” think voters should back his party.
If you want to elect a councillor who is sympathetic to those in need and to promote policies to look after our environment and support social justice, the answer is clear - Vote @ScottishLabour - even the SNP agree! pic.twitter.com/MWOvTsaIfD
— John Ruddy (@jruddy99) April 26, 2022
The SNP’s deputy leader in Angus, Bill Duff, told the Courier that his group was aiming to use the voting system “intelligently”.
“Our canvassing has identified Labour voters in Montrose,” he explained. “We are asking them to consider giving their second and third preferences to the SNP as on social policies we are more closely aligned than the current administration.”
Ruddy said he didn’t think the ploy would “hurt” his chances of being elected. He told the Courier: “It’s good they’re pointing out that if you want to have someone who supports social justice and is sympathetic towards those who are struggling then you need to vote Labour 1.”
“The interesting thing for me was it was individually addressed. They’ve obviously got information on Labour voters out there. They are obviously trying to encourage tactical voting in a way.”
READ MORE: The National launches series of Leaders' Interviews ahead of local elections
An SNP spokesperson commented: “In Angus as elsewhere, if you want hard-working SNP councillors focussed on helping families through the cost of living crisis you need to vote SNP.”
Scottish Conservative local government spokesman Miles Briggs MSP added: “This is a pretty desperate appeal by the SNP to try to shore up their vote in Angus.
“But it underlines the point that it doesn’t really matter whether you vote Labour or SNP, you’ll still end up with the same thing: a council run by either or both.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel