The family of a man who died in police custody remain “full of rage” as they search for the truth about his death, their lawyer has said.
Sheku Bayoh died in May 2015 after being restrained by officers who were responding to a call in Kirkcaldy, Fife.
The gas engineer’s family have claimed race played a part in his death and criticised the subsequent investigation.
A public inquiry, chaired by Lord Bracadale, is examining events surrounding the death of the 31-year-old, and will begin evidential hearings in May.
Lawyer Aamer Anwar, who represents the Bayoh family, said they have remained “dignified but full of rage” over the past few years.
Speaking in a video address to the Scottish Trades Union Congress (STUC) conference in Aberdeen, he said: “They are not asking for anything special, just the truth, because without truth there can be no justice.
“Last year, thousands marched for George Floyd, social media was awash with Black Lives Matter. Well what the family are saying is black lives matter in Scotland too.”
Mr Anwar said families should never have to rely on their own efforts to make sure the full facts about deaths in police custody are established and that those responsible are held to account.
However he said Mr Bayoh’s mother Aminata does not want her son to be remembered simply as someone who died following a struggle with police, but as a “wonderful” and “loving” man.
He told the conference: “She says she wants people to think of her only son not as a man who died following a struggle with the police, she wants people to remember him as a bright young man who any parent would have been proud of.
“He was a wonderful son, a wonderful brother, an uncle, a loving partner to Collette and a loving father to two young boys who will now grow up without a father.
“Sadly he is not by any means the first man to die in police custody, but if anything I hope that Sheku’s name does not fade from memory, that one day the name of Sheku leaves us a legacy that his children can be proud of.
“The dead cannot cry out for justice but it is the duty of the living to do so for them.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article