A PENSIONER is to stand trial accused of threatening Nicola Sturgeon.
William Curtis is also charged with being involved in the assault and abduction of a sheriff as well as sending a video in connection with the murder of MP Jo Cox to another SNP politician.
The 69 year-old faced the claims at the High Court in Glasgow.
The indictment first alleges that he sent emails and posted social media messages making "threatening remarks" to the First Minister between February 27 and March 6 2019. It is said this would likely have caused "fear and alarm".
Curtis is then accused of acting in a similar manner towards former Banffshire and Buchan Coast MSP Stewart Stevenson.
This charge claims on March 9, 2019, the pensioner sent a threatening online message which also contained a link to a video relating to the killing of Labour MP Jo Cox.
Both accusations are said to have occurred at an address in Aberchirder, Aberdeenshire.
Curtis is also charged - along with 60-year-old Philip Mitchell - of attacking Sheriff Robert McDonald on June 29, 2021.
The incident is said to have happened in St Mary's car park in Banff, Aberdeenshire - the town where Sheriff McDonald presides.
It is claimed the pair assaulted and abducted him by grabbing him, pulling the lawyer to the ground then sitting on top of him and detaining him against his will.
Curtis alone faces two further charges of behaving in a threatening and abusive manner.
Both he and Mitchell were in the dock for the hearing on Monday.
Each man had no lawyer and represented themselves.
Curtis pled not guilty, but Mitchell said he was not entering a plea to the charge he faces.
In lengthy submissions to Lord Doherty, Mitchell said he was facing "unlawful proceedings" and that he had been "forced" to act on his own behalf in court.
At one stage, the judge told Mitchell he had repeated a remark "at least 10 times".
Lord Doherty went on to state that it was "imperative" that a trial be fixed.
He sent a trial against both due to begin on January 9 next year in Inverness.
There will be a further hearing prior to that on June 9 this year in Livingston before judge Lord Weir.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article