TORY MPs will have a free vote on the motion to send the Prime Minister to the privileges committee to investigate whether he misled Parliament.
Leader of the House of Commons Mark Spencer said MPs would not be instructed on how to vote on two motions on the topic this afternoon.
Tory whips were previously thought to be directing MPs.
A debate on the Prime Minister’s lawbreaking started on Thursday morning and is expected to last until around 5pm.
MPs will decide whether he should be investigated by a committee of MPs.
The Government has withdrawn a counter motion which would have deferred a vote on whether to send Boris Johnson to the committee until after the Sue Gray report is published.
SNP shadow Commons leader Pete Wishart described the move as a "supreme effort of kicking the can down the road".
He said Tory MPs "had better be absolutely certain what is in that can because I suspect, when they eventually have to open it, it will be packed full of the most rancid, noxious contents that they will then have to feast upon".
Spencer said: “The Prime Minister has indicated he’s keen for the House to decide on the business later today.
“The vote on the unamended House business will be a free vote to all Conservative MPs and that’ll be the case this afternoon.”
Johnson is in Gujarat, India today and so will not be present in the Commons for the vote.
READ MORE: Douglas Ross told to 'find backbone' and support probe into Boris Johnson
He said the Commons should wait for the conclusion of the police investigation and the publication of Sue Gray’s report into parties before deciding whether the Privileges Committee should launch an inquiry.
A senior Government source told the PA news agency Boris Johnson was “happy to face” a parliamentary inquiry into whether he lied to parliament over breaking Covid rules.
The source said: “The Prime Minister has always been clear that he’s happy to face whatever inquiries Parliament sees fit and is happy for the House to decide how it wishes to proceed today and therefore will not be whipping Conservative MPs.
“They are free to vote according to how they believe we should move forward on this.
“We tabled an amendment last night because we wanted to be explicit about ensuring Sue Gray is able to complete and publish her report without any further delay, as well as allow the Metropolitan Police to conclude their investigations.
“We now recognise that – in practice – this is almost certainly likely to be the case and therefore we are happy for the Labour motion to go through, if that is the will of the House.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel