IF the party isn’t over for Boris Johnson and Rishi Sunak now, then Westminster will have yet again proved itself to be a sham government and proponents of a failing Union.
With both the Prime Minister and Chancellor making history as the first sitting politicians in high office to be found to have broken the law, you would assume that a swift resignation would be in the works.
But hours after the revelations that the pair were given fixed penalty notices for breaches of Covid-19 rules they imposed on the rest of us, most of the Cabinet had remained silent - bar Culture Secretary Nadine Dorries who came out unsurprisingly swinging in support of the PM.
READ MORE: Boris Johnson and Rishi Sunak to be fined over partygate scandal
Johnson will not go of his own accord, the fact that he has clung on this long is proof enough of that fact.
Sunak may see an end in sight to his troubles and start a new life in the USA, but even that is not confirmed.
Where this leaves us, yet again, is with Tory MPs holding the power to remove Johnson from post.
But with the Ukraine invasion boosting Johnson’s satisfaction amongst the Tory membership, they could decide that it’s worth the risk to keep him in post.
If that’s the case, the only way to get rid of Johnson is for a resounding failure of the Tories at the local election on May 5.
Why are the council elections so pivotal for Johnson and Sunak?
One thing that the Tories care more about than anything else is electability.
That is the reason Johnson, with his buffoonery and mumbling, made it as far as he did in the first place.
With Johnson the one who led the Tories to a majority in Westminster, and no longer needing the backing of the DUP as they did under Theresa May, a death knell to their vote share is the only thing that could swing the Tory MPs to resend their letters to the 1922 committee.
That is - if the huge public outrage isn’t enough to force Johnson and Sunak to stand down.
READ MORE: Keir Starmer confronted by Glasgow protester: 'Do I deserve to go to prison?'
Why does it matter in Scotland?
It could also have a devastating impact for Douglas Ross, who refused to say, after being asked by The National, if he had any concerns that partygate will impact on his party's vote share last week. He has also refused to call for Johnson to stand down in wake of the fine being issued, after already U-turning on a call to him to go.
The latest revelations, just four weeks before the vote, could cause a shake-up amongst Scotland's councils. Currently the Tories do not have complete control of any of Scotland's local authorities.
But they are in eight coalitions across the country - Aberdeen City, Aberdeenshire, Angus, Argyll & Bute, East Dunbartonshire, Moray, Perth & Kinross and the Scottish Borders - with independents and LibDems.
Local elections have a notoriously low voter turn out and are difficult to poll accurately - even the smallest shift could push the Tories out of power in some places.
It also matters because Westminster still makes decisions which impact on Scotland. Johnson is now a proven liar, who misled parliament, and despite the fact that he is unpopular up here, his refusal to grant a second independence referendum is holding Scotland back.
This latest saga of boozing and bingeing on taxpayers cash whilst the rest of the country stuck to the rules, shows that they believe there is one rule for them and another for us.
Johnson and Sunak should not be allowed to wriggle out of this, they should be forced to go.
If they don’t and Tory MPs don’t intervene, then it will be even clearer that the only option for Scotland is independence, and voters will see that too.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel