PRIME Minister Boris Johnson's LGBT adviser has said he is “dismayed” by the decision not to include transgender people in a ban on conversion therapy, while describing the cancellation of the UK Government’s landmark equality conference as an “act of self-harm by the LGBT lobby”.
Nick Herbert also called for a royal commission to “detoxify” and take the politics out of the trans debate.
It comes after the UK Government has faced fierce criticism over a series of U-turns last week on promised legislation to outlaw conversion therapy, and its backtracking on commitments to include transgender people in the ban.
At least 200 LGBT+ and HIV organisations pulled out of the UK’s first international conference on LGBT rights, Safe To Be Me, in protest, leading to its cancellation.
Hundreds of people protested against the UK Government’s decision outside Downing Street on Saturday.
Lord Herbert of South Downs, Boris Johnson’s special envoy on LGBT rights, wrote on his website: “The conference’s cancellation is damaging to the Government and to the UK’s global reputation.
“But it is also an act of self-harm by the LGBT lobby."
He accused the LGBT+ charity Stonewall of orchestrating the boycott and of shedding “crocodile tears” over the subsequent cancellation.
My comment on the Conversion Therapy u-turn, cancellation of the #SafeToBeMe2002 global equality conference, the LGBT lobby, the PM’s comments on trans issues, and why we need a Royal Commission to detoxify the trans debate and find common ground https://t.co/lUjO6B5SbQ
— Nick Herbert (@nickherbertcbe) April 10, 2022
Herbert said: “LGBT groups were understandably dismayed, as was I, when a promised Conversion Therapy ban was suddenly dropped and then only partially reinstated just hours later."
The exclusion of trans people reflected “concern that more time is needed to ensure that legitimate therapies to help young people with gender dysphoria are not inadvertently criminalised,” he said.
Such concerns can be allayed, he said, while warning ministers against conflating helping people with “ideology” that can “do irreparable harm”.
“We must address the concerns and make the case for change, deploying the evidence and reassuring parliamentarians that a ban which includes trans people is a safe and justifiable course to take,” he wrote, while criticising “shouty protests” over the issue.
The former Conservative MP for Arundel and South Downs also said it was wrong to brand Johnson as “transphobic” for saying last week that “biological males” should not compete in women’s sports and that women should have access to single-sex spaces in places such as hospitals and prisons.
Calling for a royal commission, Herbert said: “We must not allow a descent into a political mire which is dominated by extremes and which suffocates the reasonable middle ground”.
Led by a senior judge and with “truly neutral” members, the inquiry would “examine these issues dispassionately”, he said.
“Weighing the evidence on contested areas such as sport, safe spaces for women, and gender identity services for children and young people … would be a better way to detoxify the debate, protect trans people from being caught in the political crossfire, and find the common ground we need.
“No-one will win from a culture war on these issues, and those most harmed will be trans people who already feel stigmatised, people who are different yet just like us, human beings who deserve greater kindness than today’s politics will permit."
A Stonewall spokesperson said the withdrawal of more than 200 organisations from the Safe To Be Me conference, due to take place in June, “shows the depth of feeling and unity within the LGBTQ+ sector about the decision to continue to allow trans people to be subjected to these harmful practices”.
They added: “We remain in ongoing dialogue with the Government on a range of policy issues, but could not support this conference when the Prime Minister continues to ignore the medical and human rights consensus on the need for a trans-inclusive ban on conversion therapy.”
Meanwhile, hundreds of demonstrators gathered outside Downing Street to demand that transgender people be included in the proposed conversion therapy ban.
They shouted “keep trans in the ban” and “LGB with the T”, while many waved the pink, white and blue transgender pride flag.
Campaigner Peter Tatchell told the crowd: “We were promised a total ban.
“[Prime Minister Boris Johnson] has given us a half-baked ban, which we will never ever accept.
“The only ban worth having is a ban for everyone, including trans people.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here