ALEX Salmond has been told to take down a Yes sign from his property due to a planning dispute.
The wooden sign, painted with a saltire, was hung up on the Alba Party leader's garden 18 months ago, the Press and Journal reported.
However, after a complaint prompted an investigation, Aberdeenshire Council labelled the sign political advertising.
As such it is subject to planning rules and likely will not be allowed to stay in place due to the proximity of the property to a listed former mill.
Salmond has vowed to challenge the ruling that the sign is political despite the sign matching the logo of the "Yes" campaign.
The former first minister blasted it as “pettifogging officialdom” and said he had written to the council's chief executive demanding they rethink what he deemed "bureaucratic silliness".
READ MORE: Alex Salmond responds to Alex Cole-Hamilton's demands on RT and Ukraine
The Alba Party leader said: "The sign has been up for 18 months since it was carved from driftwood by local Strichen man Mike Morgan.
“There are issues about freedom of speech but, basically, the council officials should get their priorities right and their facts straight.”
The man behind the wooden sign claimed it would be a "great shame" to see it go.
Morgan said the sign had been used for a "group of ramblers who [they] were serving refreshments to after the first lockdown".
An email from the council’s head of environment and infrastructure services, Paul Macari, states that the sign should have required “advertising consent”.
It read: "No such consent is in place and therefore the sign comprises a breach of planning control.”
The location in the proximity of the B-listed property also means it “impacts on the setting of the listed building”.
Macari adds: “It is considered to have a negative effect on amenity.
“It is our intention to pursue the removal of the sign or seek a formal planning application for its retention.”
A spokesperson for Aberdeenshire Council said: “Following a complaint from a member of the public we have assessed the sign in question and advised Mr Salmond that, should he wish to keep the sign, he will require advertisement consent.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel