Prime Minister Boris Johnson said that reports of the strip search of Child Q were “deeply distressing and deeply concerning”.
Child Q was strip-searched by female Metropolitan Police officers at her school in 2020 without another adult present and in the knowledge that she was menstruating.
The 15-year-old had been wrongly suspected of carrying cannabis.
The case has sparked outrage from politicians and the public, with London mayor Sadiq Khan sharing his “dismay and disgust”, and equalities minister Kemi Badenoch calling it an “appalling incident”.
Protests took place during the weekend in London over the incident.
The Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) launched its investigation following a complaint in May 2021, and said it had completed its inquiries and was finalising its report.
In the Commons on Wednesday, Labour’s Helen Hayes (Dulwich and West Norwood) asked Mr Johnson “whether he believes that the characteristic dither and delay of his Government in responding to this appalling case is remotely acceptable when it comes to the safety of children?”
An update on Child Q: @AnntoinetteBra1 & I have been in contact with the school that Child Q attended, seeking assurance on the actions that have been taken in response to this horrific incident, & on future work to rebuild trust with students, parents, & the wider community. 1/3
— PhilipGlanville (@PhilipGlanville) March 22, 2022
Mr Johnson replied: “I think that is a completely ridiculous characterisation of the response of the Government because, of course, the reports of this incident are deeply distressing and deeply concerning.
“Everybody shares her feelings about that but the Metropolitan Police have rightly apologised and the IOPC is investigating, and for that reason it would not be right to comment further.”
On Tuesday, mayor of Hackney Philip Glanville – the borough where the incident took place – said that the headteacher of Child Q’s school should stand down.
Writing on social media, he said that he and Labour councillor and deputy mayor Anntoinette Bramble had “been in contact with the school that Child Q attended, seeking assurance on the actions that have been taken in response to this horrific incident, and on future work to rebuild trust with students, parents, and the wider community”.
“Since then we’ve sadly only heard more troubling reports from staff, families and young people disturbed about the situation and eager for change,” he said.
“We don’t say this lightly, but we feel we’ve no choice but to express our lack of confidence in the current leadership of the school.”
He added that they both wished “to ask that the headteacher should stand down and allow that school and its community the new start it needs to heal from this traumatic experience and by doing so also fully recognise the traumatic impact on Child Q and her family”.
Facing questions about the incident from the London Assembly’s police and crime committee, Met assistant commissioner Louisa Rolfe said: “We’re very concerned about what’s happened here.
“The safeguarding review findings – which the Metropolitan Police were very keen to co-operate with and support fully – has identified the exceptional nature of this. But, in saying that, I’m not suggesting that this is something that we shouldn’t be incredibly concerned about, or that it’s an isolated matter.
“Of course, any search of children in any circumstances is something that should be … rigorously reviewed and thoroughly understood.
“The IOPC investigation will look in detail at the officers’ actions. The safeguarding review will pick up the actions of the school and their involvement in this matter.”
She said she thought it “would be unusual for response officers to be called to a school to deal with an incident of this nature” and the force instead expected its schools officers – who have a “higher level of training in safeguarding” – to “develop close relationships working with schools to address any concerns”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here